Ferrari explains dip in straightline speed at Austin

Ferrari insists the lack of straightline speed over the United States Grand Prix weekend had nothing to do with its Formula 1 engine.

Ferrari explains dip in straightline speed at Austin

With the Italian team upset that rival outfits were linking its drop in top speed to a technical directive issued by the FIA outlawing engine fuel-flow tricks, it is not hiding away from the fact that the performance characteristic of its car was different in Austin.

However, Ferrari insists the TD altered "nothing" on its power unit, and said that what was new was how it approached its downforce levels.

All season the Italian outfit has run with lower wing settings compared to its rivals to boost its speed on the straights.

However, this has been at the expense of cornering – where rivals Mercedes and Red Bull have proved to have the edge.

Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto has revealed that for the United States Grand Prix, Ferrari elected to test with a higher downforce approach to see how that affected its overall pace against its main rivals.

Asked by Motorsport.com to explain why GPS traces showed Ferrari’s straightline speed performance was not as strong as recent races, Binotto said: “It is true that we were not gaining on the straights as much as the past races, but we matched our competitors in cornering – at least in qualifying.

“The trade off between grip limit and power limit has been moved this weekend, as a test on our side, to try to match their cornering. I think that it is as simple as that.

“We were still competitive in qualifying, but there was something in the race to understand and we need to understand what is best for the next races in terms of trade off.”

Read Also:

One other aspect that needs to be taken into account when analysing Ferrari’s straightline speed performance over the Austin weekend was that Charles Leclerc was running a Spec 2 engine.

Following an oil leak that stopped the Monegasque driver in final free practice, Ferrari elected to switch him back to a less powerful Spec 2 powerunit that had been used from the Spanish to the Hungarian Grands Prix.

Asked if the performance of the powerunit was down by quite a lot, Binotto said: “It was not down by quite a lot. It was slightly down which is what we were expecting between the upgrade of engines. That was a powerunit 2 and not the third we introduced in Monza.”

Ferrari’s rivals had been quick to let it be known that the Italian team’s straightline speed advantage was not as great in Austin as it had been at previous races.

One source suggested that a 0.7-0.8 seconds advantage over the opposition at previous tracks had been trimmed back to 0.5 seconds last weekend.

The rowing back of Ferrari’s edge was something that world champion Lewis Hamilton confirmed when asked by Motorsport.com after the race if he was surprised how much his Italian rivals had faded.

“On the performance side, no, I’m not surprised,” he said. “You saw that advantage they had through the season and even last year they had a huge amount of power.

“But this year, out of nowhere, they had a ton of power. Really just at will, whenever they wanted, they seemed to have more.

“This weekend, I don’t know how their speed traces with ours, but it’s definitely not how it used to be. It was seven tenths we were losing on the straights before.”

But Binotto made a point in Austin on Sunday night of expressing how disappointed he was that rival teams had suggested the technical directive was linked to a change in the performance profile of his team. 

He was clear that what the FIA had published made absolutely no difference to his team, and that the outfit had actually spent little time evaluating the details of the TD.

“Honestly we will look through the technical directive,” he said. “We have not done it this weekend in detail, we have seen it.

“I think it is number 35 of the season. It is a normal process where teams ask for clarification from the FIA and the FIA replying. Did it have an impact on the qualifying? I don’t know anything. I am not able to answer you.”

shares
comments
Kvyat: Perez clash penalty "stupid" and "unacceptable"

Previous article

Kvyat: Perez clash penalty "stupid" and "unacceptable"

Next article

Why Hamilton's finest moment was also Bottas's

Why Hamilton's finest moment was also Bottas's
Load comments
The joy that exposes F1’s key weakness Prime

The joy that exposes F1’s key weakness

Long-awaited wins for ex-Formula 1 drivers Marcus Ericsson and Kevin Magnussen in IndyCar and IMSA last weekend gave F1 a reminder of what it is missing. But with the new rules aimed at levelling the playing field, there’s renewed optimism that more drivers can have a rewarding result when their day of days comes

The F1 figures Red Bull and Mercedes can't afford to see again Prime

The F1 figures Red Bull and Mercedes can't afford to see again

OPINION: An interloper squad got amongst the title contenders during Formula 1’s street-circuit mini-break, where Red Bull left with the points lead in both championships. But, as the campaign heads back to purpose-built venues once again, how the drivers of the two top teams compare in one crucial area will be a major factor in deciding which squad stays in or retakes the top spot

Formula 1
Jun 16, 2021
Why Alfa's boss is up to the task of securing a stronger F1 future Prime

Why Alfa's boss is up to the task of securing a stronger F1 future

Two tenth places in recent races have lifted Alfa Romeo to the head of Formula 1's 'Class C' battle in 2021, but longer-term the Swiss-based squad has far loftier ambitions. With the new 2022 rules set to level out the playing field, team boss Frederic Vasseur has good reason to be optimistic, as he explained to Motorsport.com in an exclusive interview

Formula 1
Jun 15, 2021
How Barnard's revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction Prime

How Barnard's revolutionary McLaren transformed F1 car construction

The MP4/1 was pioneering by choice, but a McLaren by chance. STUART CODLING relates the tangled (carbon fibre) weaves which led to the creation of one of motor racing’s defining cars

Formula 1
Jun 15, 2021
Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool Prime

Why the end is nigh for F1’s most dependable design tool

Wind tunnel work forms the bedrock of aerodynamic development in Formula 1. But as Pat Symonds explains, advances in virtual research are signalling the end of these expensive and complicated relics.

Formula 1
Jun 13, 2021
Why Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour Prime

Why Mosley’s legacy amounts to far more than tabloid rumour

The newspapers, naturally, lingered over Max Mosley’s tainted family history and niche sexual practices. But this is to trivialise the legacy of a big beast of motor racing politics. Stuart Codling weighs the life of a man whose work for safety on both road and track has saved hundreds of thousands of lives, but whose penchant for cruelty remains problematic and polarising.

Formula 1
Jun 12, 2021
Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture Prime

Why pragmatic Perez isn't fazed by no-nonsense Red Bull F1 culture

Sergio Perez has spent most of his career labouring in Formula 1’s midfield, wondering whether he’d ever get another shot at the big time. Red Bull has handed him that chance and, although life at the top is tough, the Baku winner is doing all the right things to get on terms with Max Verstappen, says BEN ANDERSON

Formula 1
Jun 11, 2021
What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight Prime

What the data tells us about the F1 2021 title fight

Formula 1 has been tracking car performance using timing loops mounted every 200m around each circuit – to the extent that it was able to anticipate Ferrari’s 'surprise’ pole in Monaco. PAT SYMONDS explains what this means for this season and beyond

Formula 1
Jun 10, 2021