Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

Driver arrested and banned after ramming car in the pits, knocking over crew members

General
Driver arrested and banned after ramming car in the pits, knocking over crew members

Louis Foster: Throwing a yellow doesn’t kill the race, NASCAR does it for fun

IndyCar
Louis Foster: Throwing a yellow doesn’t kill the race, NASCAR does it for fun

How victory in Portugal could have a bearing on Hyundai’s WRC future plans

Feature
WRC
Feature
Rally Portugal
How victory in Portugal could have a bearing on Hyundai’s WRC future plans

How Fabio Di Giannantonio struck a nerve with Pedro Acosta: 'Nobody passes me while looking at me' 

MotoGP
French GP
How Fabio Di Giannantonio struck a nerve with Pedro Acosta: 'Nobody passes me while looking at me' 

Can F1 save its races in Bahrain and Jeddah? Here’s how every option could play out

Formula 1
Can F1 save its races in Bahrain and Jeddah? Here’s how every option could play out

How winding back the clock helped Fabio Quartararo salvage a good home GP

MotoGP
French GP
How winding back the clock helped Fabio Quartararo salvage a good home GP

IndyCar, IndyCar Officiating announce changes following Rossi’s Indy road course incident

IndyCar
Indianapolis Road Course
IndyCar, IndyCar Officiating announce changes following Rossi’s Indy road course incident

"It's a business" – Lando Norris explains why drivers don't have more say in F1's rules

Formula 1
Miami GP
"It's a business" – Lando Norris explains why drivers don't have more say in F1's rules

Controversy hits Mercedes’ alleged two-phase front wing actuators

After the Chinese Grand Prix, teams submitted the designs of their active aero solutions to the FIA, which led one team to seek clarification on the W17’s moveable front wing flaps

George Russell, Mercedes

The issue surrounding Formula 1 compression ratios is not yet fully closed, and Mercedes is once again under scrutiny. While the FIA will clamp down on the high-profile compression ratio loophole from 1 June, a new area of discussion has opened up around the Silver Arrows’ front wing.

Instead of focussing on the AMG M17 E Performance power unit inside the W17, all eyes are now on the aerodynamics of the 2026 car’s front wing. After the Chinese Grand Prix, teams were required by regulation to make their designs public, allowing the FIA – as well as rival teams – to review the concepts developed on the new single-seaters. This same process occurs regularly through the season to ensure transparency on the grid. 

After this process, the Mercedes front wing raised several eyebrows on the grid. However, the team is not under investigation by the FIA for its movable front wing, which has been described as having a two-phase operating concept.

Instead, technical checks are being carried out as part of the ongoing development of the 2026 regulations and are currently under review. According to the FIA, aerodynamic characteristics of this kind fall within this category of assessment. 

The closing movement of the wing reportedly occurs in two stages: the first complies with the 400-millisecond limit set by the 2026 regulations, satisfying the sensor used to monitor movable aerodynamics. However, there is a second command – bringing the wing elements to full closure – and this extends the closing time beyond the 400-millisecond allowance.

L'ala anteriore in livrea speciale della Mercedes W17 per Suzuka

The Mercedes W17’s front wing in special livery for Suzuka

Photo by: Mercedes GP Petronas Formula One Team

It is easy to find video clips online showing the activation of the Mercedes system and the operation of this “two-phase” wing, suggesting a possible irregularity on which the FIA will have to rule. The solution is believed to reduce the effect of the sudden forward load transfer just before braking, improving the car’s balance during the critical phase of corner entry.

The initial request for regulatory clarification was originally attributed to Ferrari by a report from Italian publication Autoracer. However, the Scuderia has denied this.

According to information available to Motorsport.com, the report is believed to have come from another team in the paddock, which remains anonymous for now. More details are expected ahead of this weekend’s grand prix at Suzuka.

It will be interesting to see how the paddock positions itself on this solution in Suzuka. The wing will still be used on the W17s of George Russell and Kimi Antonelli, as the FIA has pointed that this falls under the standard procedure where the FIA and the teams regularly engage with one another.

Collaboration and consensus are always the goal in matters such as this, with the FIA and teams in regular dialogue either individually or through the Sporting Advisory Committee, the Technical Advisory Committee, the F1 Commission or the PUAC. 

See also:
Previous article Lando Norris praised by fans after heartfelt gift to McLaren staff is revealed
Next article Five things to look out for at F1's Japanese GP

Top Comments

Latest news