AlphaTauri explains why it voted against cost cap rule change
AlphaTauri Formula 1 chief Franz Tost says changes to the financial regulations must be made “in a proper way” after voting against sporting penalties for procedural breaches last week.
The 2021 season marks the first year that F1 is racing under a new budget cap and financial regulations, limiting each team to spending $145 million per season.
Within the financial regulations, F1 lawmakers are permitted to sanction teams for breaches via financial penalties, minor sporting penalties, material sporting penalties or enhanced monitoring.
But it emerged last week that discussions over the introduction of sporting penalties for procedural breaches had seen three teams - AlphaTauri, Red Bull and Ferrari - not show their support.
Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto later explained that the team wanted greater clarity before it could give its backing to the change, but that he was not against sporting penalties being used.
AlphaTauri team principal Tost echoed Binotto's comments on Friday, saying the responsibility now lies with the FIA to give clarification about the proposed changes.
"It's quite clear, this is a change during the season, and what we requested is simply a clarification, and we wait now until the FIA will come up with this," said Tost when asked by Motorsport.com about AlphaTauri's position on the matter.
"Then we will decide how to continue. I don't want to go into details here, because as you know, this is confidential contents.
"AlphaTauri, as you know, is absolutely not against cost cap or against any amendments for the cost cap.
"But it has to be done in a proper way, and we simply need to define in detail what the FIA wants with this. Therefore, we requested for this clarification."
Talks between the teams and the FIA over the proposed tweaks to the financial regulations are set to continue in the coming weeks.
Another area being discussed by teams at the moment relates to a proposed driver salary cap that would place a fresh limit on spending that is currently outside the financial regulations.
Tost has been one of the main voices calling for the change, and said on Friday that he thought a sum of "30 million for both drivers" was a good landing point.
"This is in discussion, and it depends as always on how much financial resources the different teams have, and in which direction we will go," Tost said.
His suggestion was supported by Aston Martin team boss Otmar Szafnauer, who said it should be "in that region", but Haas chief Gunther Steiner felt "a lot more work" was required before a figure could be proposed.
Share Or Save This Story
1998 Belgian GP: When the Schumachers went to war
The race that transformed perceptions of Red Bull
Hamilton in the process of selecting Brad Pitt’s co-star for F1 movie
Arvid Lindblad nearly flips world's shortest Fiat Panda in bizarre YouTube challenge
“I’m not enjoying life” – How Yuki Tsunoda’s Red Bull F1 stint “exhausted” him
How Arvid Lindblad has shown that he's found his feet in F1
VR46 star warns adding sprint qualifying in MotoGP could go against riders’ health
Fernando Alonso explains future talks as F1's greatest circuits "killed" by 2026 rules
F1 fans back Isack Hadjar after Red Bull contract extension
F1 driver contracts: How long is each driver tied down for?
Ten years of Baku: Can F1 2026 bring back the fear factor?
Great debate: Which circuit should host the F1 2026 finale if the calendar has to change?
Italy’s next F1 world champion?
What's behind the talks between the FIA president and Fernando Alonso over ADUO?
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments