Opinion: Why taking wins away won't solve NASCAR's problem

After a weekend at Darlington where both of the race wins were deemed “encumbered finishes” after the fact, the chorus is growing louder among fans and media calling for NASCAR to strip wins from violators who end up in Victory Lane.

Opinion: Why taking wins away won't solve NASCAR's problem
Race winner Denny Hamlin, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Martin Truex Jr., Furniture Row Racing Toyota takes the checkered flag
Kyle Larson, Chip Ganassi Racing Chevrolet, takes the checkered flag
Jimmie Johnson, Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet takes the win
Kyle Busch, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota takes the checkered flag
Race winner Denny Hamlin, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Erik Jones, Furniture Row Racing Toyota tech inspection
Dale Earnhardt Jr., Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet goes through inspection
NASCAR inspection tent
Ty Dillon, Germain Racing Chevrolet at the technical inspection
Kyle Larson, Chip Ganassi Racing Chevrolet inspection
Kyle Busch, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota, Matt Kenseth, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota, Kurt Busch, Stewart-Haas Racing Ford green flag start
Fans
Start: Kyle Busch, Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota Kevin Harvick, Stewart-Haas Racing Ford lead
Fans
Erik Jones, Furniture Row Racing Toyota, Kyle Larson, Chip Ganassi Racing Chevrolet start

Personally, I can’t blame them.

It’s beginning to borderline on the ridiculous the number of times we are seeing winning cars found to have issues – not immediately after the race in inspection but rather after they are more closely examined later at NASCAR’s R&D Center in Concord, N.C.

Only once in the history of what is now the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series has the winner of a race had his win taken away after the fact due to a technical violation – and that was the very first-ever series event held in Charlotte, N.C., in 1949.

For the most part, NASCAR’s belief is that those in attendance (and now watching on TV and device) should know who the winner is when they leave the event (or the broadcast goes off the air).

I have always agreed with that stance and I still do, although I grow more sympathetic to the other side with the issuance of each new penalty report.

I also believe stripping wins does nothing to solve the underlying problems and may, in fact, add to one the rule-breaking creates in the first place – NASCAR’s credibility gap.

From what I hear and see the main argument for stripping wins away is that somehow that penalty is so severe it will automatically deter anyone from ever trying anything that may result in a violation that would receive that penalty.

While that may deter someone who has not yet won a race from doing so, it really has no practical effect for someone like Denny Hamlin at Darlington who already had a “legal” win in hand which guaranteed him entry in the playoffs.

Teams and drivers already lose everything of value that come from encumbered wins – please see Joey Logano’s current predicament for reference.

And in the scheme of the season, aren’t those the most important things? Somehow we are to believe the actual trophy (or mark under wins in the record book) is more valuable to a driver or team than the championship benefits that come with it?

I simply find that hard to believe.

Also, we’re often told how stripping wins away works so well in short track racing. Tell me, after the first winner’s car was disqualified at the Snowball Derby, did that stop other teams from breaking the rules to win after that? Answer: Not at all.

Secondly, the only people who lose in stripping wins away are the same ones who do now when a violation is found after the fact – fans who attend races or watch them on TV.

Fans may spend hours to travel to a race, then hours to watch the race, then hours to return home. They leave having seen a battle for a victory and a driver celebrating. Even if it’s a driver they don’t like, are we to believe they will feel vindicated because days later they learn the driver loses the trophy?

I would be angry – angry that I wasted my time and money watching an outcome that for all intents and purposes never had any meaning. Taking the win away from the driver days later isn’t going to magically wipe away my experience or give me my money back.

Jeff Gordon actually brought up another excellent point this week.

NASCAR typically takes the winner’s car and sometimes second or third place – but not always. What happens if NASCAR only takes the winner and it fails and strips the win away, handing it to the second-place car. If the second-place car didn’t undergo the same inspection at the R&D center as the winner, how do you know it is legal?

The only way you fix that issue is to take all the cars to the R&D Center – impractical and nearly impossible.

Which leads to the main problem that needs to be addressed – preventing these issues from occurring in the first place.

NASCAR has an obligation to its fans and the sponsors that help fund the sport to do whatever it takes to ensure a fair playing field and a credible outcome.

The most common issue in post-race inspection failures of late seem to be found in the car’s suspension pieces. Perhaps it’s time NASCAR mandate and even provide the suspension pieces to the teams.

Before the cries of stifling teams’ innovation and creativity are bellowed, save it. It’s the teams’ “innovation and creativity” that have gotten NASCAR into this mess in the first place. They are the ones who should pay the price for fixing it.

The last thing NASCAR needs right now is a credibility problem, especially giving anyone the idea of what they spend their valuable time and money watching isn’t a legitimate competition.

Tracks and NASCAR are trying to get people to come to their events, not find reasons to drive them away.

The best and surest way to fix that is to prevent it from happening in the first place. Taking wins away may sound nice but it still leaves the door open for the violations to reoccur.

It’s time to shut the door tight.

shares
comments
Logano: "We are in a do-or-die situation" this weekend
Previous article

Logano: "We are in a do-or-die situation" this weekend

Next article

Hamlin: "I'm fine with taking wins away" from rule violators

Hamlin: "I'm fine with taking wins away" from rule violators
Load comments
How Larson took the long way round to NASCAR Cup glory Prime

How Larson took the long way round to NASCAR Cup glory

From villain to hero, Kyle Larson had to reach his lifelong goal the hard way and go through a very public shaming after a ban for using a racial slur, but his talents shone long before his name grabbed the headlines...

NASCAR Cup
Nov 10, 2021
How NASCAR is gearing up for its "biggest change" in 2022 Prime

How NASCAR is gearing up for its "biggest change" in 2022

It’s not just Formula 1 that’s set for upheaval in 2022, as the NASCAR Cup series adopts its Next Gen cars that will cast any in-built advantages aside and require teams to adopt a totally new way of operating. Far more than just a change of machinery, the new cars amount to a shift in NASCAR's core philosophy

NASCAR Cup
Oct 12, 2021
Why Bubba Wallace’s Talladega win is such a big moment for NASCAR Prime

Why Bubba Wallace’s Talladega win is such a big moment for NASCAR

Bubba Wallace claimed his maiden NASCAR Cup Series at Talladega on Monday to become the first Black victor in the category since Wendell Scott in 1963. Both Wallace and Scott had faced obstacles and racism in their paths to their breakthrough wins, and NASCAR is trying to put it right with its range of diversity programmes

NASCAR Cup
Oct 5, 2021
Why NASCAR's most resilient driver has landed on his feet at 23XI Prime

Why NASCAR's most resilient driver has landed on his feet at 23XI

In a career that has had many ups and downs, Kurt Busch has been written off many times before. But facing career uncertainty after the sale of Chip Ganassi's NASCAR team, the 2004 Cup champion has found a new berth at Denny Hamlin and Michael Jordan's 23XI organization - which underlines his enduring value

NASCAR Cup
Aug 31, 2021
From the archive: Dale Earnhardt’s final Autosport interview Prime

From the archive: Dale Earnhardt’s final Autosport interview

The death of Dale Earnhardt in the 2001 Daytona 500 shocked NASCAR to the core. At the Daytona 24 Hours, two weeks before his fatal accident, ‘The Intimidator’ shared his expectations of challenging for an eighth Cup title with JONATHAN INGRAM, in an article first published in the 15 February 2001 issue of Autosport magazine. Little did we know then what tragedy would unfold…

NASCAR Cup
Feb 18, 2021
The lasting NASCAR legacy after Dale Earnhardt’s death Prime

The lasting NASCAR legacy after Dale Earnhardt’s death

On February 18, 2001, seven-time NASCAR Cup champion Dale Earnhardt – the fearless ‘Intimidator’ – was in his element at Daytona International Speedway. While his own DEI team’s cars ran 1-2 towards the finish line, his famed #3 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet Monte Carlo was playing rear gunner to block any late runs from the chasing pack. As the cars tore through Turns 3 and 4 on that fateful final lap, Earnhardt maintained the strongarm tactics that encapsulated his persona… but his actions in those moments sadly proved to be his last.

NASCAR Cup
Feb 18, 2021
Inspired by Pitbull, the “revolution” sweeping through NASCAR Prime

Inspired by Pitbull, the “revolution” sweeping through NASCAR

The NASCAR Cup Series is changing. Whether it be the gradual morphing out the seasoned drivers of yesterday as the next generation step up, a radical calendar shake-up featuring more road courses than ever before and the prospect of an all-new car on the horizon, stock car racing’s highest level is nearing the end of a huge facelift.

NASCAR Cup
Feb 16, 2021
The NASCAR storylines to watch out for in 2021 Prime

The NASCAR storylines to watch out for in 2021

This weekend's Daytona 500 kickstarts a NASCAR Cup season that promises plenty of intrigue courtesy of new owners and a refreshed calendar. Here's what you need to know ahead of the new season…

NASCAR Cup
Feb 13, 2021