Williams: Suppliers and budget not factors in F1 car delay
Williams has made it clear that the delays in the build of its new Formula 1 car were not caused by external suppliers being late, nor a lack of budget.

While the team is conducting a thorough investigation to get to the bottom of why its new FW42 missed the opening two days of pre-season testing, deputy team principal Claire Williams has dismissed two theories.
"I think there were many stories around about what potentially could have been the cause of it," she said.
"A couple that I read were that there were issues with external suppliers. That wasn't the case.
"Or that financially we were in a difficult position and that had an impact on car build. It didn't."
While not wanting to elaborate further on what were the real causes of the delay, Williams said that the effort required to create an F1 car from scratch should never be underestimated.
"I think we take for granted sometimes that we're going to get one car to the test track and two cars to the race track," she added. "But Williams still builds, or designs and builds it race cars in-house, in their entirety.
"There are 22-odd-thousand parts to a car, which we have to design, which we have to manufacture, which we have to assemble, which we have to put through crash testing etc, and that's an enormous job. And we just didn't make it for a number of reasons.
"I think it can happen, I think we've seen historically that it can happen, and we need to just make absolutely sure that the situation doesn't happen again."
Williams said it was important the investigation into what went wrong exposed all the factors that contributed to the problem, so as to ensure that the team did not risk being late with its car again.
"There has been some work started, but it will probably take a few weeks to fully compile that, and we have to get it right because if we don't get the review right, then we're not going to get next year's programme right.
"So we've got to take our time and make sure we cover every base off, and make sure we get it right for next year."
While Williams has made up for lost time with some decent mileage in the second week, the team does not appear to have made any major competitive gains.
Williams said it was too early to suggest the team was slowest overall, but made clear that it was not expecting any dramatic change from how it ended last year.
"I think we still have to wait and see exactly where we are," she said.
"Clearly we don't want to be at the back again, but I have always said, and I said last week, this is journey, it is a pathway and other teams have done an exceptional job to maybe make better inroads than we have.
"But we'll keep working hard to make sure that we recover from where we were last year, and from where we currently may be in testing."

George Russell, Williams FW42
Photo by: Jerry Andre / Sutton Images

Previous article
Alonso would "feel bad" to drive McLaren in pre-season
Next article
Sainz quickest as crash curtails Ferrari's day

About this article
Series | Formula 1 |
Teams | Williams |
Author | Jonathan Noble |
Williams: Suppliers and budget not factors in F1 car delay
Trending
How Do Drivers Stay Fit For F1 Grand Prix?
Ronnie Peterson and Jochen Rindt Tribute
The double whammy that is defining Vettel’s F1 fate
It's been a tough start to Sebastian Vettel's Aston Martin F1 career, with a lack of pre-season testing mileage followed by an incident-packed Bahrain GP. But two key underlying factors mean a turnaround is no guarantee.
The themes to watch in F1's Imola return
Three weeks is a long time in Formula 1, but in the reshaped start to the 2021 season the teams head to Imola to pick things up after the frenetic Bahrain opener. Here's what to look out for and the developments to follow at the Emilia Romagna Grand Prix
The 'new' F1 drivers who need to improve at Imola
After a pandemic-hit winter of seat-swapping, F1 kicked off its season with several new faces in town, other drivers adapting to new environments, and one making a much-anticipated comeback. Ben Anderson looks at who made the most of their opportunity and who needs to try harder…
The delay that quashed Aston Martin’s last F1 venture
Aston Martin’s only previous foray into Formula 1 in the late 1950s was a short-lived and unsuccessful affair. But it could have been so different, says Nigel Roebuck.
Verstappen exclusive: Why lack of titles won't hurt Red Bull's ace
Max Verstappen’s star quality in Formula 1 is clear. Now equipped with a Red Bull car that is, right now, the world title favourite and the experience to support his talent, could 2021 be the Dutchman’s year to topple the dominant force of Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes?
Is Formula 1 as good as it has ever been now?
For many, many years Formula 1 has strived to do and to be better on all fronts. With close competition, a growing fanbase, a stable political landscape and rules in place to encourage sustainability, 2021 is on course to provide an unexpected peak
How Williams’ new structure adheres to a growing F1 trend
Williams held out against the tide for many years but, as MARK GALLAGHER explains, the age of the owner-manager is long gone
When a journeyman driver's F1 career lasted just 800m
Nikita Mazepin’s Formula 1 debut at the Bahrain Grand Prix lasted mere corners before he wiped himself out in a shunt, but his financial backing affords him a full season. Back in 1993 though, Marco Apicella was an F1 driver for just 800m before a first corner fracas ended his career. Here’s the story of his very short time at motorsport’s pinnacle.