What 2011 comparisons tell us about Turkey's no-grip surface
Formula 1 drivers had been chomping at the bit to experience the high-speed swoops of the Istanbul circuit with the current generation of high-downforce cars.
Talks ahead of the opening day of practice for the Turkish Grand Prix had been of the thrills to be expected, and what a joy it would be to take Istanbul's iconic Turn 8 completely flat out.
But all their hopes were wiped away as soon as the cars were unleashed on Friday morning, as the newly resurfaced track surface offered up almost zero grip.
Things were also not helped by track officials trying to improve the situation and washing the track early on Friday morning.
That only served to make things even more difficult for everyone as the surface had not fully dried by the time FP1 started.
As Max Verstappen said: "Yeah, let's not do that again."
While drivers steadily got accustomed to the conditions, even if Lewis Hamilton labelled it 'terrifying', it is the laptimes of the day that perhaps tell us the true story of the impact the track surface has made.
There is not much recent data to go on, but some comparisons with the 2011 season do at least offer us some basis to show how far off the current track is.
Back in 2011, Sebastian Vettel took pole position for the Turkish Grand Prix with a laptime of 1m25.049 seconds.
During this morning's free practice session, Verstappen's best lap was 1m35.077 seconds – so more than 10 seconds adrift of that Vettel lap.
Verstappen's time would not have been enough to get within the necessary 107% back in 2011, and in fact the slowest man on the grid that year – Narain Karthikeyan – would have been nearly four seconds up the road with his 1m31.564s.
As the track conditions ramped up today though, and the drivers learned about how best to get their tyres working, Verstappen got down to a 1m28.330s in the afternoon.
That was still three seconds adrift of Vettel, but at least pointed to being roughly in the ballpark of what F1 cars should be doing.
However, what we need to take into account is just how much faster the current cars should be. For the huge downforce that 2020 F1 cars generate mean they should not just be matching what happened in 2011, they should be smashing those times.
Looking at some comparisons from race tracks that have featured this year and in 2011, we can see that current machinery should be lapping around five seconds per lap faster than they did back then.
Here are the comparisons for the Nurburgring and Barcelona to give us a rough indication.
German Grand Prix pole position time (Nurburgring)
Spanish Grand Prix pole position time (Barcelona)
If we estimate that the cars should be five seconds per lap faster than 2011, then, with a decent track surface, the pole position time for Turkey this year should have been around 1m20s.
Getting down to that level seems very unlikely right now. But, according to some team insiders tonight who are furiously trying to recalculate their expectations for the weekend, F1 teams may even struggle to get near that 2011 pole time.
Verstappen spoke for many drivers about the disappointment of not being able to push as they would have liked. "Yes, it's a bit of a shame," he said.
Perhaps the only saving grace for drivers right now is that the original plans to wash the track again overnight are understood to have been abandoned – so at least the rubber laid down today may still be there tomorrow so they aren't starting from scratch again.
Ford, Chevrolet Gen3 driver swap
Ford, Chevrolet Gen3 driver swap Ford, Chevrolet Gen3 driver swap
Fraga lands SUPER GT drive in Gran Turismo-backed Lexus
Fraga lands SUPER GT drive in Gran Turismo-backed Lexus Fraga lands SUPER GT drive in Gran Turismo-backed Lexus
TOM'S reveals striking new liveries for 2023 SUPER GT season
TOM'S reveals striking new liveries for 2023 SUPER GT season TOM'S reveals striking new liveries for 2023 SUPER GT season
First shakedown for Gen3 Supercars Camaro
First shakedown for Gen3 Supercars Camaro First shakedown for Gen3 Supercars Camaro
The pioneering F1 car that preceded Lotus’s terminal decline
Throwback: The 1987 Lotus 99T The pioneering F1 car that preceded Lotus’s terminal decline
How Tyrrell became a racing Rubik’s cube as it faded out of F1
The story of Ken Tyrrell's team How Tyrrell became a racing Rubik’s cube as it faded out of F1
Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver
Assessing Hamilton's Mercedes stint Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver
Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era
Why new-look Haas is a litmus test Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era
The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff
Assessing Wolff's Mercedes influence The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff
The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate
The line-up Ocon, Gasly may emulate The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate
Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?
Who were the fastest F1 drivers? Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?
Nico Hulkenberg: Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return
Why Hulkenberg is ready for return Nico Hulkenberg: Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.