Revealed: Formula 1 team payments for 2017
Ferrari's drop to third place in the constructors' championship last year did not stop the Maranello squad from maintaining its place as Formula 1's top commercial rights earner, Motorsport.com can reveal.
At the start of each season, Formula One Management projects revenues from three streams - hosting fees, media rights and other income avenues, such as hospitality and trackside sponsorship.
FOM's 2016 turnover is estimated at $1.83bn, with underlying revenues estimated at $1.38bn.
It then distributes approximately 68 percent of projected underlying revenues among the qualifying teams.
That figure of $940m is 3.5 percent down on last year's figure due to anticipated increases in marketing costs in line with FOM owner Liberty's plans for the sport, and a reduction in the number of grands prix from 21 to 20.
Revenues are distributed across the 10 teams through nine monthly payments from April, with a final “check” payment - when definitive revenues have been calculated – in March 2018.
The amount each team receives is based on a series of factors, including performance over the course of the season, past success and special agreements.
The table below, sourced by Motorsport.com, details how revenues are disproportionately distributed.
2016 FOM team earnings in $m – disbursed over 10 instalments during 2017, in order of payout*
|Team||Col 1||Col 2||Col 1+2||LST**||CCB***||Other||Total||2016 ±||2016 Class|
|Red Bull||36||52 (16%)||88||39||35||161||+12%||2|
|Force India||36||36 (11%)||72||72||+7%||4|
|Toro Rosso||36||23 (7%)||59||59||+3%||7|
|Haas *****||19 (6%)||19||19||-||8|
Column 1 payments are calculated based on a team's classification over two of the past three years, while Column 2 payments are based solely on a team's 2016 classification, with only the top 10 qualifying.
The Column 1 pot is divided equally among all qualifying teams, with each estimated to earn $36m.
Had Manor survived, that figure would have been $32.5, $1m down on the previous season, but following the outfit's closure, its payment was shared equally with the other nine qualifying teams.
As Haas has only completed one season, it does not qualify for Column 1 payments.
Column 2 is calculated on a sliding scale from first to 10th place with first receiving 19 percent of the fund, sixth nine percent and 10th four percent.
Ferrari, Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren have agreed separate deals for constructors' championship bonus payments. Ferrari also receives a long-standing team payment while Williams collects a heritage payment.
Red Bull receives an extra payment for being the first team to sign the current bi-lateral agreement, which runs to 2020, and this totals $35m.
After meeting its agreed target of two world championships, Mercedes earns a special annual payment that matches Red Bull's.
Ferrari will receive $180m in total, representing almost one fifth of the total 'pot' but $12m less than last year.
That's $108m more than Force India receives, despite the latter finishing just one place adrift in the constructors' championship. Mercedes won both the drivers' and constructors' championships for the third successive year, but still received $9m less than Ferrari.
Force India and Williams both finished ahead of McLaren in the standings, but each receive less courtesy of McLaren's CCB payment.
If the pot was shared out equally, each team would get $94m. That would leave Ferrari's payment down by $86m while Sauber, the final team to qualify for Column 1 and 2 payments, would receive an extra $45m.
Motorsport.com contacted FOM, which refused to comment on the revenues.
* Figures rounded off for simplicity
** Long Standing Team
*** Championship Constructor Bonus (double champions)
**** Heritage Bonus
***** Haas does not qualify for Col 1 income until after second season (2017)
F2 racer Sato switches to ELMS with United Autosports
F2 racer Sato switches to ELMS with United Autosports F2 racer Sato switches to ELMS with United Autosports
RLL engineering team “more focused” in 2023, says Rahal
RLL engineering team “more focused” in 2023, says Rahal RLL engineering team “more focused” in 2023, says Rahal
What really happened when F1 drivers went on strike
What really happened when F1 drivers went on strike What really happened when F1 drivers went on strike
How will FIA decide on F1's potential new teams?
How will FIA decide on F1's potential new teams? How will FIA decide on F1's potential new teams?
Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver
Assessing Hamilton's Mercedes stint Assessing Hamilton's remarkable decade as a Mercedes F1 driver
Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era
Why new-look Haas is a litmus test Why new-look Haas is a litmus test for Formula 1’s new era
The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff
Assessing Wolff's Mercedes influence The Mercedes F1 pressure changes under 10 years of Toto Wolff
The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate
The line-up Ocon, Gasly may emulate The all-French F1 partnership that Ocon and Gasly hope to emulate
Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?
Who were the fastest F1 drivers? Who were the fastest drivers in F1 2022?
Nico Hulkenberg: Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return
Why Hulkenberg is ready for return Nico Hulkenberg: Why F1's nearly man is refreshed and ready for his return
Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss
Why Vasseur relishes the pressure Why Vasseur relishes 'feeling the pressure' as Ferrari's F1 boss
The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023
F1 2023's crucial tech changes The crucial tech changes F1 teams must adapt to in 2023
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.