Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

WRC Estonia: Sami Pajari claims sensational maiden WRC victory

WRC
Rally Estonia
WRC Estonia: Sami Pajari claims sensational maiden WRC victory

Carlos Sainz hit with grid penalty for F1 Belgian Grand Prix

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Carlos Sainz hit with grid penalty for F1 Belgian Grand Prix

This is the starting grid for the 2026 F1 Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
This is the starting grid for the 2026 F1 Belgian GP

Why F1 drivers are being beaten by their own power units

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Why F1 drivers are being beaten by their own power units

The data that reveals how different Spa is under F1's 2026 rules

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
Belgian GP
The data that reveals how different Spa is under F1's 2026 rules

Carlos Sainz praises Kimi Antonelli for apology after “idiot” comment

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Carlos Sainz praises Kimi Antonelli for apology after “idiot” comment

Super Formula: Kakunoshin Ohta closes in on title, Igor Fraga takes sprint win

Super Formula
Fuji
Super Formula: Kakunoshin Ohta closes in on title, Igor Fraga takes sprint win

Lewis Hamilton's Ferrari "didn't feel the same" after Belgian GP practice crash

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Lewis Hamilton's Ferrari "didn't feel the same" after Belgian GP practice crash

Attempt to block F1 Miami Grand Prix dismissed by judge

The court challenge by local residents to halt the inaugural Miami Grand Prix on the grounds of damage to hearing due to noise from the event has been denied by a Miami judge today.

Miami track overview

This clears the final roadblock for the event to take place as planned at the Hard Rock Stadium site in Miami Gardens on May 6-8.

Judge Alan Fine, who was being asked to grant a special hearing that would block the race from happening, found that “any potential harm is avoidable” in terms of hearing damage – despite the plaintiffs bringing forth new evidence as requested.

“The bottom line here is I’m not going to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing prior to May 6,” Fine said. He then listed a series of reasons why that “compelled” him to make the decision.

“Two are more important than the rest,” he added. “Although the burden may seem unfair to the plaintiffs [the residents], I do find that any potential harm is avoidable.

“In combination with that, the evidence proffered so far regarding the potential hearing loss is, in my view, very highly speculative. It is not based on any current Formula 1 noise information, and the most recent affidavit from overnight does not take into consideration the south wall [a noise barrier previously erected at the venue].”

Judge Fine also ruled that the belated date of this lawsuit, lodged on March 21, also had a bearing on his decision.

“The other co-equal reason is the delay in bringing this action in seeking injunctive relief,” he added. “I’m not persuaded by the legal soundness of waiting to file until a special events permit was issued.”

Judge Fine didn’t rule out scope for further court proceedings after the race occurs in 2022, adding that he’d expect a “full-blown evidentiary hearing in four-five months” after the May 8 race takes place.

Sound monitoring will be carried out by the stadium, as part of its obligations under the Memorandum of Understanding that is part of the event’s contract with the city. The judge also ordered that one of these sites must be located in or near residential areas.

Read Also:
Previous article Gasly: Upgrades will be ‘big test’ of AlphaTauri's F1 potential
Next article What history tells us about Leclerc’s early F1 championship lead

Top Comments

Latest news