Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

Has George Russell hit his stride too late? 'With this form I would have been in the fight'

Formula 1
Formula 1
Azerbaijan GP
Has George Russell hit his stride too late? 'With this form I would have been in the fight'

F1 pundit slams Franco Colapinto's "outrageous" Baku crash but rejects Lando Norris's race ban call

Formula 1
Formula 1
Azerbaijan GP
F1 pundit slams Franco Colapinto's "outrageous" Baku crash but rejects Lando Norris's race ban call

How an “informed gamble” enabled Toyota to beat Alpine in the Fuji 6 Hours

WEC
Fuji
How an “informed gamble” enabled Toyota to beat Alpine in the Fuji 6 Hours

Sebastian Vettel gives update on F1 future as he opens up on life after retirement

Formula 1
Formula 1
Azerbaijan GP
Sebastian Vettel gives update on F1 future as he opens up on life after retirement

Alpine's WEC future decision ‘any day now’ as Geely talks near conclusion

WEC
WEC
Fuji
Alpine's WEC future decision ‘any day now’ as Geely talks near conclusion

Sami Pajari’s wish ahead of WRC title decider, as FIA tweaks tyre allocation again

WRC
WRC
Rally Italy
Sami Pajari’s wish ahead of WRC title decider, as FIA tweaks tyre allocation again

Lando Norris apologises to Franco Colapinto over F1 race ban comments

Formula 1
Formula 1
Azerbaijan GP
Lando Norris apologises to Franco Colapinto over F1 race ban comments

Flavio Briatore apologises to Lando Norris after Azerbaijan GP crash

Formula 1
Formula 1
Azerbaijan GP
Flavio Briatore apologises to Lando Norris after Azerbaijan GP crash

Why Vettel escaped track limits penalty at Monza

Ferrari Formula 1 driver Sebastian Vettel escaped a penalty for going off track in Q3 at Monza because of an anomaly in the wording of the relevant regulations.

Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF90

Vettel ran wide at Parabolica on the Q3 lap that ultimately earned him fourth place on the grid.

Some TV angles appeared to show his tyres outside the white line – and hence the boundaries of the track – but after considering the matter the stewards opted not to penalise him, a decision that caused a stir on social media given that other drivers had laptimes deleted for apparently similar transgressions in FP3.

The relevant part of the FIA F1 Sporting Regulations says: “Drivers will be judged to have left the track if no part of the car remains in contact with it and, for the avoidance of doubt, any white lines defining the track edges are considered to be part of the track but the kerbs are not.”

This is supported by a paragraph in the FIA’s International Sporting Code, which reads: “A driver will be judged to have left the track if no part of the car remains in contact with the track."

In both cases there is a clear reference to “contact.” However the issue was complicated by Version 3 of the Race Director's Note issued by the FIA’s Michael Masi, and which was updated to alert the teams to the possibility of penalties for running wide at Parabolica.

However, in it there was a reference not to contact, but to the wheels being over the white line.

Masi wrote: “A laptime achieved during any practice session or the race by leaving the track (all four wheels over the white track edge line) on the outside of Turn 11 [Parabolica] will result in that laptime and the immediately following laptime being invalidated by the stewards.”

In reviewing the video evidence the stewards noted that the side view showed that Vettel’s car was indeed not in contact with the track, as the contact patch of his tyres was outside the line.

However, on-board and overhead views indicated the “wheels”, which protrude beyond the tyre contact patch, were still atop the white line, as mentioned in the race director’s notes.

Given this apparent anomaly, and the fact that the offence was related directly to the notes, the stewards felt obliged to give Vettel the benefit of the doubt.

In their judgement they noted: “The Stewards reviewed multiple camera angles, some of which appeared to show that the tyres were not in contact with the white line of the track edge however other angles appeared to show that part of the front “wheel” (when viewed from above) may have been within the bounds of the white line.

"This cast an element of doubt which is considered significant enough to give the “benefit of doubt” to the driver in question.”

Previous article Ricciardo "couldn't believe" airborne Peroni F3 crash
Next article Monza result made F1 feel like "a different sport" for Renault

Top Comments

Latest news