Renault: F1 engine rules not "fit for purpose"
Renault says it is open to a change in Formula 1's engine regulations over the next few years, after suggesting that the current power units are not 'fit' for the sport's demands.
The French car manufacturer made it clear several years ago that it would only remain in F1 if the sport moved to the turbo hybrid rules that came into force at the start of 2014.
The success of those regulations has been called into question recently on cost and spectacle grounds, and manufacturers are currently involved in discussions to come up with alternative ideas to head off the threat of an independent engine from 2017.
Renault F1 managing director Cyril Abiteboul accepts that the current engines may not be the best way forward for the sport, but thinks it would be a mistake to go too radical with alternatives.
"Hybrid regulations are important, not just to Renault but to any car maker," he said. "If you look at the future product line of most brands, you will see hybrid elements on all cars.
"If you ask me about this particular set of regulations, how important they are, we should not be precious. I am not completely convinced that we have the engine regulations that are completely fit for purpose for the model of modern F1.
"[I am talking about] for the show, for the cost for the manufacturer, for price for the team, also noise and serviceability and so on and so forth.
"Plus also there is all the sporting elements associated with it – like the token system, which is extremely confusing, and the penalty system, which is extremely confusing. I don't think we have something brilliant.
"Having said that, do we need to write this off completely or improve what needs to be improved and fix what needs to be fixed rather than trying to come up with something completely new? I'm not quite sure.
"The problem is when we try to come up with something completely new, which is trying to be a breakthrough in comparison to what we had before, it is not necessarily brilliant.
"The regular thing is evolution rather than radical changes. It is very difficult to anticipate what will be the effect of radical change. But we are completely open to change in the regulations."
Share Or Save This Story
Brundle awarded OBE in King’s New Year’s honours
The new rules dilemma that will define the 2025 F1 season
Verstappen issues Red Bull title warning in push for RB21 progress
You Ask The Questions: Robert Kubica
On this day: Michael Schumacher’s final unsportsmanlike manoeuvre
20 years ago, Michael Schumacher held off Fernando Alonso in Imola F1 duel
David Malukas "good to go" after hospital visit following IndyCar practice crash
Ross Chastain must serve costly in-race penalty after three inspection failures
NASCAR Cup North Wilkesboro starting lineup: Blaney on pole with qualifying cancelled
Lewis Hamilton hailed as a "legend" after emotional fan interaction at F1 Belgian GP
How Antonelli found half a second to thwart Verstappen in Belgian GP qualifying
How Franco Colapinto has survived and thrived in the hothouse intensity of F1
What we learned from Friday practice at the 2026 F1 Belgian GP
“A shock to the system” – Why teams fear the worst with F1’s 2026 cars at Spa
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments