Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

George Russell: “You’ve got to laugh” at bad luck as F1 title drifts away

Formula 1
Formula 1
Bahrain GP in Malaysia
George Russell: “You’ve got to laugh” at bad luck as F1 title drifts away

Elfyn Evans suffers puncture ahead of Power Stage WRC title decider

WRC
WRC
Rally Italy
Elfyn Evans suffers puncture ahead of Power Stage WRC title decider

F1 Bahrain GP in Malaysia: Max Verstappen wins in chaos as George Russell retires

Formula 1
Formula 1
Bahrain GP in Malaysia
F1 Bahrain GP in Malaysia: Max Verstappen wins in chaos as George Russell retires

Five quick takeaways from Bahrain GP in Malaysia

Formula 1
Formula 1
Bahrain GP in Malaysia
Five quick takeaways from Bahrain GP in Malaysia

Enea Bastianini: "I've been waiting a long time for this moment"

MotoGP
MotoGP
Japanese GP
Enea Bastianini: "I've been waiting a long time for this moment"

Marc Marquez sent body double to Motegi kart race: “We are not here to mess around or drive go karts"

MotoGP
MotoGP
Japanese GP
Marc Marquez sent body double to Motegi kart race: “We are not here to mess around or drive go karts"

F1 Bahrain GP in Malaysia descends into chaos as car trouble prompts red flag

Formula 1
Formula 1
Bahrain GP in Malaysia
F1 Bahrain GP in Malaysia descends into chaos as car trouble prompts red flag

Kyle Larson debates purpose of stage points, call them "participation awards"

NASCAR Cup
NASCAR Cup
Las Vegas II
Kyle Larson debates purpose of stage points, call them "participation awards"
Breaking news

Mercedes: Oil burn not behind new engine call

Mercedes insists that the timing of new oil burn restrictions did not play a part in its decision to bring its final engine of the season to the Belgian Grand Prix.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
Toto Wolff, Mercedes AMG F1 Director of Motorsport
 Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
 Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08
 Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H
 Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari, Maurizio Arrivabene, Team Principal, Ferrari
Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H

The German car manufacturer’s decision to bring its fourth power unit at Spa – the final race where engines could run at a higher oil burn level – prompted a number of conspiracy theories about the motivation of it sacrificing valuable development time.

The wild theories were further fuelled when the FIA clarified that Mercedes would be allowed to keep burning 1.2-litres of oil per 100km with its power unit for the rest of the season, while Ferrari would have to run at a lower 0.9l per 100km for its final engine.

But speaking at the Italian Grand Prix, Mercedes motorsport boss Toto Wolff was adamant that the decision was taken because the team wanted a performance boost from developments introduced in Belgium – and not because of oil burn.

“It was completely blown out of all proportion,” said Wolff about the oil burn saga. “The reason we introduced it early was in order to bring some performance to the track, with the risk of having to do many [more] races until the end of the season than our direct competitors.

“Also you lack time for further development. The longer you wait for the last introduction of engine the more you can probably add the upgrade.”

"These are the reasons we brought it and not in order to extract a performance advantage out of the capability of burning more oil. So if you ask the FIA, you will be quite interested to see what the results are.

Sources have suggested that Mercedes’ engine in Belgium ran below the 0.9l per 100km level during the Belgian GP, so would have complied with the new restriction in place from now anyway.

Although Ferrari was caught by surprise in Belgium about Mercedes’ decision to introduce a new engine in Belgium – having been under the impression that its rival would not do so – the team insists it has no major problem with the matter.

Team principal Maurizio Arrivabene said: “First of all we have no conflict, and I don’t want to comment on this type of thing.

“Mercedes has introduced early one engine, which also has disadvantages during the course of the season as it has no developments left.”

Motorsport.com understands that Ferrari’s final engine could appear at the Malaysian Grand Prix, but only when it has passed reliability tests at Maranello.

There are suggestions that the updates will deliver a good step in performance, but there remain some concerns about longevity.

Arrivabene dismissed suggestions that Ferrari was delaying its introduction in light of the oil burn ruling – which allows it to continue running its engines at the old 1.2 litre per 100km limit.

“First of all, we are not introducing our power unit number four for that reason [oil burn],” he said. “It is nothing to do with that.

“We have a plan at the beginning of the year and we would like to introduce power unit number four at the right time with the right power – this is the answer. It is nothing to do with the oil.”

Previous article Mercedes in command at Monza: Bottas leads 1-2 in second F1 practice session
Next article McLaren: Performance, not finances, will determine engine choice

Top Comments

Latest news