Formula 1
Formula 1
02 Jul
-
05 Jul
FP3 in
06 Hours
:
27 Minutes
:
53 Seconds
R
Styrian GP
09 Jul
-
12 Jul
FP1 in
6 days
16 Jul
-
19 Jul
FP1 in
13 days
31 Jul
-
02 Aug
FP1 in
27 days
R
70th Anniversary GP
06 Aug
-
09 Aug
FP1 in
34 days
13 Aug
-
16 Aug
FP1 in
41 days
R
Italian GP
03 Sep
-
06 Sep
FP1 in
62 days
24 Sep
-
27 Sep
FP1 in
83 days
29 Oct
-
01 Nov
FP1 in
118 days
R
Brazilian GP
12 Nov
-
15 Nov
FP1 in
132 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
26 Nov
-
29 Nov
FP1 in
146 days

Mercedes explains why it rejected reverse grid plan

shares
comments
Mercedes explains why it rejected reverse grid plan
By:
Jun 3, 2020, 3:08 PM

Mercedes boss Toto Wolff has explained the reasons why his team blocked a move to trial reverse grid qualifying races this year – insisting the sport doesn't need 'gimmicks' to make things exciting.

F1 team principals discussed the idea last week of running reverse grid qualifying sprints at the second of double header events this year as a way of making the repeat events more exciting.

But despite a majority of teams being in favour of the move, Mercedes stood out and was not willing to accept the plan.

With F1 needing unanimous support to get the rules change, momentum behind the plan has fallen away and the standard format will be used for the entire season.

Read Also:

Speaking to selected media on Wednesday during a video teleconference call, Wolff made clear that there were three clear reasons why Mercedes was not willing to accept the reverse grid experiment.

"It seems to be a common pattern in Formula 1 that we're digging out old ideas that have been analysed previously and rejected," he said.

"Then somebody thinks it's great and it's back on the back on the agenda. So you need to look at the reasons why we were against it, and there's three fundamental reasons.

"First, I believe that F1 is a meritocracy. Best man in best machine wins. We don't need a gimmick to turn the field around to create more exciting racing.

"Number two, I know it from touring car racing that strategies become a very useful tool when one race result is basically making the grid for the next one.

"Just imagine one of the drivers not running well on the Sunday race of the first Spielberg weekend, and you decide to DNF the car. That will be the car that starts from pole for the qualy race.

"And if that car starting on pole on the qualy race is within midfielders, he will certainly be on pole for Sunday and win the race. There will be cars in the middle that will defend and block as much as they can.

"And therefore, for the quick cars coming from behind, it will mean more risk for a DNF and that could influence the championship.

"And then [third], from a pure performance standpoint, whoever the fastest car may be, and it's not necessarily us, will be penalised [compared to the] second and third quickest teams, because they will simply start in front.

"As we know the margins are often not very large, so therefore it's a bit of an opportunistic move to give some teams an advantage."

While Red Bull team boss Christian Horner said it would be disappointing if F1 did not use the opportunity of the shaken-up calendar to trial format experiments, Wolff is clear that even fans did not seem to want reverse grids.

"We said this is not the time to experiment with things that interestingly, didn't even have the support of Formula 1's fan community," he said. "In a survey only 15% expressed an interest in reverse grids."

Next article
Horner expects "very different" F1 to be just as "fierce"

Previous article

Horner expects "very different" F1 to be just as "fierce"

Next article

Wolff: Vettel interest remarks not just "lip service"

Wolff: Vettel interest remarks not just "lip service"
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Author Jonathan Noble