Rebellion left baffled by Spa wet-weather struggles
Rebellion Racing has no explanation for the lack of wet-weather pace that prevented it from challenging Toyota in last weekend's Spa FIA World Endurance Championship round.
The solo Rebellion R-13 started from pole position after heading all four timed sessions, each held in dry conditions, prior to the race, but lost out to the pair of Toyota TS050 Hybrids when the race went green after four laps on the wet track behind the safety car.
Bruno Senna, Gustavo Menezes and Norman Nato fell a lap down on the best of the Japanese cars in the first hour of the six-hour contest and were never able to make up the lost ground thereafter on the way to a distant third place.
The Gibson-powered car was up to seven seconds off the pace around the 4.35-mile Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps when the track was at its wettest.
Nato said: "Tricky conditions have been difficult for us in the past, and it has been difficult today, more than expected to be honest.
"We knew that we couldn’t fight with the Toyota [in the rain], but we shouldn't have been that far away — maybe a second or two maximum, but not seven seconds. We just need to understand what’s happening.
"So far we don’t know what the problem is: it’s a lack of grip in general."
Nato explained that the car was unable to switch on the Michelin tyres, a problem encountered by Rebellion in both the wet and the dry over the 2018/20 WEC superseason when the LMP1 privateers were running tyres designed for the hybrid Toyota.
A development programme ahead of the current campaign was designed to address that problem.
Nato explained that the biggest problem for the Rebellion drivers came when there was standing water on the track.
"As soon as there is water we are suffering with aquaplaning and general grip — it wasn't easy to keep the car on track," he said.
Rebellion was a strong favourite to reprise its 2019/20 WEC victories at Shanghai and Austin because it was running a significantly smaller penalty than the Toyotas under the system of success handicaps introduced for LMP1 this year.
The R-13 was penalised by 1.58 seconds a lap, the #8 Toyota by 3.08s and the winning #7 Toyota by 3.52s.
Rebellion was also running in high-downforce specification, whereas Toyota compromised its performance at Spa by choosing to run the low-downforce version of its Le Mans kit.
The Rebellion was competitive over the final three and a half hours of the race after the track dried. It was seven hundredths faster than the winning Toyota over its fast 50 laps in this portion of the race.
Nato tried to draw positives from the Spa weekend, adding: "It’s a negative in terms of race result, but it’s not a negative in terms of a weekend because the pole we had was quite good.
"During the race, we tried to give the feedback to the engineers on tyre pressures to understand it for the future."
Nato suggested that it is imperative that Rebellion overcome the problem before the Le Mans 24 Hours round of the WEC on September 19/20.
"If at Le Mans we have these kind of tricky conditions, it’s going to be a tough race for us," he said. "We need to wake up and find at least half of the problem for Le Mans."
#1 Rebellion Racing Rebellion R-13 - Gibson: Bruno Senna, Gustavo Menezes, Norman Nato
Photo by: JEP / Motorsport Images
Previous article
WEC targeting a "minimum" of six races in 2021
Next article
Porsche fuel-saving was "tough mentally", says Estre
Why Toyota's Le Mans victory was not as simple as it looked
Toyota scored its fourth Le Mans 24 Hours victory and a 1-2, with the #7 car of Kamui Kobayashi, Mike Conway and Jose Maria Lopez beating the #8. But although it looked straightforward from the outside, Toyota faced serious problem that had to be solved with some quick-thinking and ingenuity.
What we've learned from the Le Mans 24 Hours so far
The new dawn for the FIA World Endurance Championship has arrived at Le Mans, as Hypercars prepare to duel for victory in the world's oldest endurance race. Motorsport.com picks out the 10 things we have learned in the build up to the race.
Le Mans 2021: The team-by-team guide
After a two-month delay due to the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the 2021 Le Mans 24 Hours is set to get underway with the start of the Hypercar era at the Circuit de la Sarthe.
Can Toyota's #7 crew break its Le Mans curse?
One Toyota, normally with the number 7 on the side, always seems to attract the bad luck in the Le Mans 24 Hours. Mike Conway, Kamui Kobayashi and Jose Maria Lopez are hoping for a change in fortune this time around, but face significantly more unknowns than in recent years
Why Glickenhaus should be taken seriously on its Le Mans bow
Many were quick to dismiss Glickenhaus when the boutique American sportscar firm's entry into the top class of the Le Mans 24 Hours was announced. It's all-new LMH racer, powered by an engine built by a rally specialist, goes in as the underdog against Toyota but the mathematical odds suggest that it has more than just a faint hope of success.
How 1971's benchmark Le Mans team lost with the best car
The JW Automotive Engineering team won twice at the Le Mans 24 Hours with ageing Fords and was considered the heavy favourite to add more victories to its tally after partnering with Porsche. But despite being armed with the all-conquering 917, this formidable combination was never as successful in real life as on the big screen.
Why Jose Maria Lopez isn’t motivated by emulating Fangio
Having twice missed out on Formula 1 and reinvented himself as a touring car driver, Jose Maria Lopez has had a rocky ride to becoming a four-time world champion. One more would put him level with his nation's favourite son, but there's another prize he would value far more than the honour of matching Juan Manuel Fangio's tally.
The understated Le Mans legend who has earned a testimonial
OPINION: After 24 Le Mans 24 Hours participations, 50-year-old Emmanuel Collard will be absent from the grid this year, stuck at the mercy of his gold driver grading. But, while he's not motivated by breaking start records, the French veteran is determined to return to the field next year.
