Formula 1
Formula 1
R
Australian GP
12 Mar
-
15 Mar
Next event in
44 days
19 Mar
-
22 Mar
Next event in
51 days
02 Apr
-
05 Apr
Next event in
65 days
16 Apr
-
19 Apr
Next event in
79 days
30 Apr
-
03 May
Next event in
93 days
07 May
-
10 May
Next event in
100 days
21 May
-
24 May
Next event in
114 days
R
Azerbaijan GP
04 Jun
-
07 Jun
Next event in
128 days
11 Jun
-
14 Jun
Next event in
135 days
25 Jun
-
28 Jun
Next event in
149 days
02 Jul
-
05 Jul
Next event in
156 days
16 Jul
-
19 Jul
Next event in
170 days
R
Hungarian GP
30 Jul
-
02 Aug
Next event in
184 days
27 Aug
-
30 Aug
Next event in
212 days
03 Sep
-
06 Sep
Next event in
219 days
R
Singapore GP
17 Sep
-
20 Sep
Next event in
233 days
24 Sep
-
27 Sep
Next event in
240 days
08 Oct
-
11 Oct
Next event in
254 days
R
United States GP
22 Oct
-
25 Oct
Next event in
268 days
29 Oct
-
01 Nov
Next event in
275 days
R
Brazilian GP
12 Nov
-
15 Nov
Next event in
289 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
26 Nov
-
29 Nov
Next event in
303 days

Villeneuve: Ricciardo, not Vettel, deserved penalty in Canada

shares
comments
Villeneuve: Ricciardo, not Vettel, deserved penalty in Canada
By:
Jun 12, 2019, 10:35 AM

Formula 1 world champion Jacques Villeneuve says it was Daniel Ricciardo and not Sebastian Vettel who deserved to be penalised in the Canadian Grand Prix.

The five-second penalty awarded to Vettel for the way he rejoined the circuit after an off while trying to stay ahead Lewis Hamilton has proved intensely controversial, incensing the German and evoking a strong reaction from his fellow racers on social media.

For Villeneuve, the key distinction in the incident was that Vettel's transgression was not an intentional move made during wheel-to-wheel battle, and the Canadian instead reckoned the stewards should've considered the way Ricciardo defended against Mercedes driver Valtteri Bottas earlier in the race.

“I wasn’t surprised by Vettel’s penalty, because it’s often the opposite of what happens,” Villeneuve told Motorsport.com. “Ricciardo deserved a penalty for the way he drove in a straight line, and he didn’t get one. It’s often been like that.

“It’s bad for F1 anyway. It ruined the race because it was a bad call, not because, ‘Oh, it should have been a different winner.’ If Vettel had done something dirty or bad, like Ricciardo did on the straight, that would have deserved a penalty, and that would have been fine, even though it would have been another Lewis win.”

Bottas himself described Ricciardo's defending as “sometimes on the limit” yet ultimately called it “a good fight”.

Villeneuve argued Hamilton “managed to impose a penalty on Vettel”, but didn't feel the incident warranted any such verdict.

“That’s not racing,” he argued. “There should be a difference between intentional and when you go through a corner and get back on the track sideways.

“And mostly because the driver behind knows what’s happening, Lewis knew where Vettel was going. He could have come across the track much more aggressively, and he didn’t.

“It’s not a question of letting them race, because 'let them race' means people do dirty, stupid stuff. You should never do anything intentional that forces another driver to back off or put him in danger, that’s one thing.

“But you go across a chicane, you get back on the gas as hard as you can, even if it might be risking other drivers, because the guys behind know 'this guy is in the grass, he’ll probably get sideways, the chances are I’ll be squished… OK, I’ll go for the inside.’ You know it.

“Lewis did the right thing, he managed to impose a penalty on Vettel. He’s very good at that!”

Next article
The bigger frustrations within Vettel's farcical penalty

Previous article

The bigger frustrations within Vettel's farcical penalty

Next article

Mercedes reveals cause of Hamilton's hydraulics scare

Mercedes reveals cause of Hamilton's hydraulics scare
Load comments