The Ferrari update secrets revealed by Vettel's crash
Getting a close-up look at the fine details of a Formula 1’s car design can be a tricky business, especially in areas where the crowded aerodynamic structures make it easy to hide things.

However, on a weekend when Ferrari introduced some minor updates that it hopes will help unlock more performance from its car in the future, some of the finer aspects of its SF1000 were spotted after Sebastian Vettel crashed in qualifying.
With the front wing ripped from his car, it offered onlookers a chance to stop aspects of its complex nose and cape area that were not so obvious before.
Ferrari had been clear before the weekend that the changes seen on the SF1000 during the Russian Grand Prix weekend would be small and were not a total fix for some of the more fundamental flaws with this year's challenger.
And while the Sochi changes may be more about understanding in which direction the team needs to go, the package of parts installed were quite extensively different.
At the front of the car, Ferrari continues to use the wider bodied nose design that it has sported since 2016, with the introduction of the thumb style nose tip that’s used to meet the regulatory restraints.
It is in contrast to what Mercedes has done, which is utilise a more bulbous tip and very narrow pillars that transition into a more slender body, allowing more room for the ‘cape’ solution mounted to its underside.


However, in an attempt to use its central section of the car in a similar way, Ferrari added a plough to its nose solution at the Singapore Grand Prix last season. This promoted a different flow structure underneath in order to alter the car's behaviour, perhaps putting a little more load on the front axle at the same time too.

Ferrari SF1000 nose inlet detail
Photo by: Giorgio Piola
For Russia, the nose and plough have been modified slightly in order to improve flow through what have become inlets beside the thumb style tip.
The leading edge of the plough is now slightly lower to help draw flow through the inlets (left), whilst altering how the airflow and associated pressures build beneath the surface too.


Meanwhile, Ferrari's continued use of this nose and plough combination means the team still utilises a complex turning vane structure that mounts to both the rear-end of the nose and the underside of the chassis.
Comparatively speaking, the solution used by Mercedes has its cape start further back and as such, drape down into the section occupied by the turning vanes on the SF1000.
Now, had it not been for Vettel's accident during qualifying, some of the changes in this region might have gone unnoticed, as the accident damage made it much easier to see that portion of the car as it lay on the recovery truck.
Added to the footplate of the chassis portion of the turning vanes are three rows of 'crooked finger vanes', each of which arches over at the top to form an L-shaped surface (inset, red arrow).


It's a feature that shares some commonality with partner team Haas, which introduced a similar arrangement at the Spanish GP in 2019, whilst Red Bull has also added a single vane on top of its cape in this region too.

Ferrari SF1000 rear wing endplate comparison
Photo by: Giorgio Piola
A new rear wing design was installed on the Ferrari last weekend too and features some strands of the Mercedes design DNA.
The endplate's upper rear cutout now features serrated edges, whilst the thickness of the endplate beneath has been reduced in order that the upwash strikes can have a more commanding role.
Meanwhile, the straked section that hangs out over the limit of the regulatory bounding box now features just two fully enclosed holes, rather than the six slots that perforated that section previously.
Ferrari appears to have identified some of the troublesome areas of the SF1000's design and made some changes to help in the short-term until more robust upgrades can arrive.
We should start to see the green shoots of progress during the second half of this season. But the real work will likely be going into improving its chances for 2021, when it will deploy its development tokens and have a new power unit, fuel and lubricants that should help restore some of the horsepower that its current package lacks.
Related video

Previous article
Russia my "strongest race" in F1 2020 until pitstop - Ocon
Next article
Schumacher and Ilott to get first F1 practice runs

About this article
Series | Formula 1 |
Teams | Scuderia Ferrari |
Author | Giorgio Piola |
The Ferrari update secrets revealed by Vettel's crash
Trending
How Do Drivers Stay Fit For F1 Grand Prix?
Ronnie Peterson and Jochen Rindt Tribute
#ThinkingForward with Juan Pablo Montoya
The 'new' F1 drivers who need to improve at Imola
After a pandemic-hit winter of seat-swapping, F1 kicked off its season with several new faces in town, other drivers adapting to new environments, and one making a much-anticipated comeback. Ben Anderson looks at who made the most of their opportunity and who needs to try harder…
The delay that quashed Aston Martin’s last F1 venture
Aston Martin’s only previous foray into Formula 1 in the late 1950s was a short-lived and unsuccessful affair. But it could have been so different, says Nigel Roebuck.
Verstappen exclusive: Why lack of titles won't hurt Red Bull's ace
Max Verstappen’s star quality in Formula 1 is clear. Now equipped with a Red Bull car that is, right now, the world title favourite and the experience to support his talent, could 2021 be the Dutchman’s year to topple the dominant force of Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes?
Is Formula 1 as good as it has ever been now?
For many, many years Formula 1 has strived to do and to be better on all fronts. With close competition, a growing fanbase, a stable political landscape and rules in place to encourage sustainability, 2021 is on course to provide an unexpected peak
How Williams’ new structure adheres to a growing F1 trend
Williams held out against the tide for many years but, as MARK GALLAGHER explains, the age of the owner-manager is long gone
When a journeyman driver's F1 career lasted just 800m
Nikita Mazepin’s Formula 1 debut at the Bahrain Grand Prix lasted mere corners before he wiped himself out in a shunt, but his financial backing affords him a full season. Back in 1993 though, Marco Apicella was an F1 driver for just 800m before a first corner fracas ended his career. Here’s the story of his very short time at motorsport’s pinnacle.
How Raikkonen's rapid rise stalled his teammate's F1 career climb
Kimi Raikkonen's emergence as a Formula 1 star in his rookie campaign remains one of the legendary storylines from 2001, but his exploits had an unwanted impact on his Sauber teammate's own prospects. Twenty years on from his first F1 podium at the Brazilian GP, here's how Nick Heidfeld's career was chilled by the Iceman.
The nightmare timing that now hinders Mercedes
Mercedes and Lewis Hamilton took victory at the Bahrain Grand Prix despite, for a change, not having the quickest car. But any hopes of developing its W12 to surpass Red Bull's RB16B in terms of outright speed could not have come at a worse time.