Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis
Topic

Giorgio Piola's F1 technical analysis

Tech lowdown: Hidden secrets of Ferrari’s new F1 car

A lot rides on Ferrari’s new SF16-H F1 challenger, but is it really a potential Mercedes beater? Matthew Somerfield has consulted with Giorgio Piola to find out…

Tech lowdown: Hidden secrets of Ferrari’s new F1 car

Ferrari has been ringing the changes since the introduction of the 2014 regulations, with key figures spearheading its ascension to the role of title contender once more. The arrival of four-time world champion Sebastian Vettel undoubtedly provided the team with the catalyst to re-energise the team, but the likes of Maurizio Arrivabene and Sergio Marchionne have clearly had an impact too.

Arrivabene's own passion is very apparent, with the Italian wearing his heart on his sleeve and hoping to drive the team to do what they haven't done in nine years – win a World Championship. 

Meanwhile, the design team led by James Allison is now making headway, with infrastructure changes often taking a little time to impact on performance.

Fixing the problems

Ferrari's previous weaknesses are being addressed, and while they may not be able to fight for victory at every race, they will certainly be much closer than they have been in recent times.

The Scuderia has made significant strides with the power unit in 2015, narrowing the performance gap to Mercedes, much of which came from the rectification of issues they faced during 2014. However, the performance gained in combination with their long time partner Shell cannot be ignored either.

Having lost a step to fuel and lubricants rival Petronas in the lead up to the hybrid formula, Shell have worked tirelessly to recover their position with Ferrari. The information garnered from their supply in WEC, which uses very similar technologies, has likely given them more invaluable data to help close that gap too.

As we know, cars launched ahead of testing are often mere representations of what we can expect to be run during testing, let alone pound the asphalt in Melbourne. 

However, there are areas of the car that can help us better understand the direction that the team is heading, and one shining example of this is the SF16-H's front suspension… 

Comparaison of the Ferrari SF16H and the SF15T
Comparison of the Ferrari SF16-H and the SF15-T

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Pull-rod to push-rod suspension

Ferrari has persisted with pull-rod front suspension for four seasons, and has finally decided that the pros don't outweigh the cons. 

From a driver’s perspective, push- and pull-rod suspension offer almost identical kinematic performance, with the exception of how the tyre deforms. Ferrari's switch to pull-rod came at a time when there was a desire, not only by Ferrari, to exert load on the front tyre, bringing it into the thermal operating window quicker and holding it in a prime position for longer.  

As Pirelli's tyre construction and compounds have changed over the years, the need for pull-rod at the front has dissipated.

Without the mechanical requirement and the problem of excess weight that was needed to increase installation stiffness last year, the aerodynamic gains were no longer outweighing other considerations - and so the team has made the switch back to push-rod front suspension. 

Comparaison of the Ferrari SF16H and the SF15T
Comparison of the Ferrari SF16-H and the SF15-T

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Shorter nose

The other area of the SF16-H that immediately stands out is the shorter nose, with Ferrari the only team to see out the 2015 campaign with a longer appendage. 

The front wing mounting pylons are mounted as far back on the neutral section as is possible, while being placed as far from the centreline as possible in order that the maximum amount of airflow can move under the nose.

The 'thumb'-style extension also sits relatively far back over the neutral section too, with the design team looking to work the neutral section differently when compared with the car’s predecessor.

The team has clearly worked hard to reduce the length of the central thumb section, as it moves along the car’s centreline, with the boat-tail quickly terminating as the underside of the nose slopes upward.

The front wing shown is the same specification used by the Scuderia at the end of the 2015 campaign and will undoubtedly be revised during the pre-season tests.

Turning vanes detail
Turning vanes detail

Photo by: Ferrari Media Center

Turning vanes 

Under the nose we find what are believed to be just a generic set of turning vanes (highlighted in green), a carryover from the SF15-T, with a new set likely appearing during testing in order to maximise the new airflow provided by the shorter nose.

Although blocked off in the launch images, it appears that Ferrari will retain their blown front axle, with the airflow dispatched by the hollow axle (highlighted in blue), reducing the front wing’s role in reshaping the wake generated by the tyre.  

S-duct detail
S-duct detail

Photo by: Ferrari Media Center

S-duct in the pipeline?

A rather large vanity panel sits atop the SF16-H's chassis, which itself has had its shape amended, increasing the space between the reference plane and upper surface. The vanity panel could simply be used as access for setup adjustments, although I suspect we may see Ferrari introduce an 'S'-duct  similar to my illustration during the pre-season tests.

Numerous changes to the power unit have been made alongside layout changes to ancillary components. 

It's not yet fully clear as to the frequency of the coolers held within the sidepods, but it’s apparent that it has abandoned the innovative cantered and louvered solution from last year, in favour of a more conventional inclination.  

Ferrari 2015 and 2016 comparison
Ferrari 2015 and 2016 comparison

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Power unit cooling changes 

The air-liquid-air cooler, which was sandwiched between the vee of the ICE in 2014/15, is thought to have been removed by the power unit department, with the space used to suitably implement variable inlet trumpets (inset). 

Variable inlet trumpets allow a much more precise metering of the air/fuel ratio, which should help to improve efficiency and performance.

It remains to be seen whether Ferrari has retained a air-liquid-air cooler, with the most likely position for this being sandwiched between the front face of the powerunit and rear face of the fuel cell (as explained by Giorgio last week).

Thermal efficiency is one of the most important aspects of the hybrid formula: as such, decisions regarding how to cool components are paramount but also come with their own aerodynamic compromises. 

Ferrari SF16-H
Ferrari SF16-H

Photo by: Ferrari Media Center

Sidepod repackaging

The sidepod inlets appear to have been increased in size, allowing for additional cooling, based on the expectation of more grunt from the power unit. 

The sidepod surfaces have also changed in shape, as the waist starts to pull inward toward the coke bottle, with an even more svelte line now visible. The hot air outlets have been raised to allow more airflow to make its way around into the coke-bottle region.

The coke-bottle shape is now narrower because of the repositioning of the MGU-K, which will sit alongside the engine block, rather than behind it. 

This means that while Ferrari powered teams have been able to restart their car out on track in 2014/15, using the MGU-K, it appears that function may be lost and they'll only have the option of the manual starter from the pitlane like the other teams.

This repackaging of the MGU-K has had a knock-on effect, resulting in a redesign of the clutch, gearbox and crash structure assembly, affording the SF16-H a tighter coke bottle. 

Ferrari SF16H
Ferrari SF16-H

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Airbox intake changed

The airbox shape has changed from the trapezoidal design used by Ferrari since 2012 (inset) to a more conventional inverted U (highlighted in yellow), which will have an impact on the delivery of air to the turbo's compressor.  

 

Comparaison of the Ferrari SF16H and the SF15T
Comparaison of the Ferrari SF16-H and the SF15-T

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Refined engine cover 

Astride the top of the engine cover we find another winglet (highlighted in green), similar to the one added to the SF15-T last year.

For 2016, a notch has also been cut into the upper surface of the engine cover [1], in line with the winglet, maximising its performance.  Its job is to break up and realign airflow that is made turbulent by the airbox, improving the efficiency of the rear wing that lies downstream.

Further down the spine of the engine cover, an outlet [2], which has now been deleted, used to sit above the turbine, allowing any excess heat to escape.  These changes require an overall increase in the bulk of the engine cover's spine, as noted by the shorter shark fin.

The louvres that flank the cockpit [3] and expel hot air from the sidepods have also been tweaked, with many more escape points available to the team depending on the circuit demands.

Design options for 2016 Formula 1 wastegate exhausts
Design options for 2016 Formula 1 wastegate exhausts

Photo by: Giorgio Piola

Wastegate options

For 2016 the engine manufacturers have been tasked with changing their approach to how the wastegates terminate.

In 2014/15 the wastegate(s) were required to join with the main exhaust outlet, whilst the FIA have changed the regulations for 2016 to increase the noise generated by the power units.

This year there will be at least one more tailpipe visible at the rear of each car, with the option of two wastegates seemingly the preferred option for Ferrari, with the launch images showing a tailpipe aside the main one, indicating there must be another on the other side.

The rear wing, like the front, is the same specification as the one with which the team closed out the 2015 season – I expect to see a new specification before long.

The verdict

The SF16-H looks like a solid contender out of the box, with Ferrari addressing many of its previous weaknesses while trying to exploit more performance. 

However, the proof is most certainly in the pudding – and we don't have to wait long to find out if the bold claims coming from Maranello are vindicated.

shares
comments
Toro Rosso "convinced" top five finish possible in 2016

Previous article

Toro Rosso "convinced" top five finish possible in 2016

Next article

Celis: Barcelona test chance a "vote of confidence" from Force India

Celis: Barcelona test chance a "vote of confidence" from Force India
Load comments
Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track' Prime

Why Mercedes is pleased to be in the Hungary hunt at a 'Red Bull track'

Mercedes ended Friday practice at the Hungaroring with a clear gap to Red Bull thanks to Valtteri Bottas’s pace in topping FP2. But there are other reasons why the Black Arrows squad feels satisfied with its progress so far at a track many Formula 1 observers reckon favours Red Bull overall...

How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks Prime

How Red Bull endured its second car crash in two weeks

OPINION: Red Bull was justified to be upset that Lewis Hamilton survived his British GP clash with Max Verstappen and went on to win. But its attempts to lobby the FIA to reconsider the severity of Hamilton's in-race penalty were always likely to backfire, and have only succeeded in creating a PR disaster that will distract from its on-track efforts

The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach Prime

The ‘screaming’ F1 engine future that may not be out of reach

OPINION: It wasn't just the Verstappen/Hamilton clash that had the Red Bull and Mercedes bosses at loggerheads at Silverstone, with the nature of Formula 1's 2025 engines also subject for disagreement. But hopes to have loud, emotive engines that are also environmentally friendly don't have to be opposed.

Formula 1
Jul 29, 2021
How Lotus uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’ Prime

How Lotus uncovered, then squandered its last ‘unfair advantage’

Cast in the mould of its founder Colin Chapman, Lotus was powerful and daring but flawed – as it proved through further soaring peaks and painful troughs into the 1980s. DAMIEN SMITH examines a game-changing era

Formula 1
Jul 27, 2021
The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address Prime

The core problems Yas Marina’s long-awaited tweaks won't address

OPINION: Changes to the layout of Abu Dhabi’s circuit aim to reverse the trend of insipid Formula 1 races there - the promoter has even described one of the new corners as “iconic”. And that, argues STUART CODLING, is one of this venue’s abiding failings

Formula 1
Jul 26, 2021
How Ferrari offered Callum Ilott what Red Bull couldn't Prime

How Ferrari offered Callum Ilott what Red Bull couldn't

Last year's Formula 2 runner-up Callum Ilott could be on his way to becoming the first Briton to contest a grand prix in an Alfa Romeo since Reg Parnell in 1950. But, says Oleg Karpov, the Ferrari Driver Academy protege is having to temper his ambition at the moment – outwardly at least…

Formula 1
Jul 25, 2021
The signs that point to F1's rude health Prime

The signs that point to F1's rude health

OPINION: Formula 1's calendar might still be facing disruption as the pandemic affects travel but, says Mark Gallagher, the business itself is fundamentally strong thanks to the epic rivalry taking place on track and the consistent arrival of new sponsors.

Formula 1
Jul 24, 2021
The unexpected benefit of F1's sprint race repeat Prime

The unexpected benefit of F1's sprint race repeat

OPINION: Formula 1's sprint race trial at Silverstone drew mixed feedback on Saturday, but there remained the true test of how it would impact Sunday's Grand Prix. While fans were busy marvelling at Fernando Alonso's progress, a key lesson was being learned that would directly contribute to the dramatic lap-one clash at Copse the following day

Formula 1
Jul 22, 2021