Formula 1
Formula 1
03 Jul
-
05 Jul
Event finished
10 Jul
-
12 Jul
Event finished
17 Jul
-
19 Jul
Event finished
31 Jul
-
02 Aug
Event finished
R
70th Anniversary GP
07 Aug
-
09 Aug
FP1 in
3 days
14 Aug
-
16 Aug
FP1 in
10 days
28 Aug
-
30 Aug
FP1 in
24 days
R
Italian GP
04 Sep
-
06 Sep
FP1 in
31 days
R
Tuscany GP
11 Sep
-
13 Sep
Next event in
38 days
25 Sep
-
27 Sep
FP1 in
52 days
R
Eifel GP
09 Oct
-
11 Oct
Next event in
66 days
23 Oct
-
25 Oct
Next event in
80 days
R
Emilia-Romagna GP
31 Oct
-
01 Nov
Next event in
88 days
R
Abu Dhabi GP
27 Nov
-
29 Nov
FP1 in
115 days

Seidl wants F1 regulations tightened to prevent more copying

shares
comments
Seidl wants F1 regulations tightened to prevent more copying
By:
Jul 29, 2020, 12:02 PM

McLaren team boss Andreas Seidl would like Formula 1's technical regulations to be tightened to limit the extent to which teams can copy other cars.

The FIA is currently reviewing a protest from Renault over the legality over Racing Point’s RP20 car, which was based on the design of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes W10.

Racing Point has openly admitted it used pictures of the Mercedes to design its car for this year, but stressed it did so entirely within the regulations and has no concerns over Renault’s protest.

Read Also:

Seidl previously said there were “no grounds” for a protest against Racing Point, but that the case was important for F1’s future as it risked becoming a “copying championship”.

While Seidl accepted there had always been a degree of copying in F1, he said the current regulations allowed the practice to go beyond simply looking at pictures of another car.

“There’s obviously copying [which] is not just copying,” Seidl said.

“There’s copying which has always been around in Formula 1, and which is part of Formula 1. We have tried to analyse what competitors are doing by pictures that are publicly available, pictures you can take in the pit lane or on-track. I think no-one has any problem with copying parts or cars from these pictures.

“What is more important is to simply clarify and maybe also change the regulations on what can be done in terms of copying beyond this copying, where you only use publicly-available information.

“There’s room in the regulations at the moment that you can do actually a lot more, that you can do co-operations on wind tunnel technology, on the way you use the wind tunnel, on the way how you map your car in the wind tunnel.

“Also in the way how you get access to pictures of cars, and so on. I think that’s something that needs to be clarified, that we have a clear direction on what Formula 1 wants to allow there in the future.”

Renault’s protest against Racing Point has centred on the brake ducts of the RP20 car. Last year, Racing Point were supplied brake ducts by Mercedes as they were a listed part, but they no longer are for 2020.

Renault has also stressed that its protest is not about brake ducts, but about defining the future of F1 and the degree of collaboration permitted between teams.

Seidl said that remained the “key question” McLaren also wanted answering in this case.

“It’s not necessarily about doing something legal or illegal,” Seidl said.

“As I said many times, there is room in the regulations to do a lot more than just take pictures in the pit lane. That’s why we think it’s important to have these clarifications now.”

Italian GP will take place behind closed doors

Previous article

Italian GP will take place behind closed doors

Next article

Aston Martin would be "foreign territory" for Vettel

Aston Martin would be "foreign territory" for Vettel
Load comments

About this article

Series Formula 1
Teams McLaren Shop Now
Author Luke Smith