Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

"Faster than it looks" - Carlos Sainz's first impressions of Madring F1 circuit

Formula 1
Spanish GP
"Faster than it looks" - Carlos Sainz's first impressions of Madring F1 circuit

How Formula 1 driving has changed – and stayed the same

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
How Formula 1 driving has changed – and stayed the same

Esteban Ocon calls 2024 Brazilian GP podium the perfect end to Alpine chapter

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Esteban Ocon calls 2024 Brazilian GP podium the perfect end to Alpine chapter

Tech3 signs new deal with KTM for MotoGP's 850cc era after Honda talks

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Tech3 signs new deal with KTM for MotoGP's 850cc era after Honda talks

MotoGP Catalan GP: Pedro Acosta claims pole as factory Aprilias crash in qualifying

MotoGP
Catalan GP
MotoGP Catalan GP: Pedro Acosta claims pole as factory Aprilias crash in qualifying

Honda reports first annual loss in 70 years, what does it mean for its F1 project?

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Honda reports first annual loss in 70 years, what does it mean for its F1 project?

Naomi Schiff warns 2027 FIA rule changes could hit smaller F1 teams hard

Formula 1
Canadian GP
Naomi Schiff warns 2027 FIA rule changes could hit smaller F1 teams hard

Valentino Rossi up there with Jordan and Messi among the greatest ever - Franco Morbidelli

MotoGP
Catalan GP
Valentino Rossi up there with Jordan and Messi among the greatest ever - Franco Morbidelli

Red Bull says RB20 F1 design was “last big roll of the dice”

Red Bull says the bold design revamp with its RB20 was the “last big roll of the dice” for the current ground effect rules in Formula 1.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

The Milton Keynes-based team surprised rivals this year when, rather than going for a simple evolution of its dominant RB19 2023 challenger, it undertook a pretty aggressive overhaul.

That work appears to have paid off, with Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez finishing 1-2 in the first two races of the season.

Speaking about the motivation for the change, Red Bull’s chief engineer Paul Monaghan said that the change was about ensuring there was scope to keep unlocking performance over the remainder of the rules cycles before the reset that is coming in 2026.

“If we choose to make some bigger changes on the car it opens up more options for us,” he said. “That’s part of our reason to say ‘let’s go ahead and change it more fully’.

“It’s probably the last big roll of the dice because into 2025 you have to be looking at the 2026 car.”

With teams needing to get as early a head start as possible on the 2026 rules, Monaghan says there will be decisions made soon about how to split resources into next year.

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

“You will see quite early on in terms of aerodynamic research if we are bumping into some limits,” he said. “At that point you have to say ‘okay, can we look at it differently and what do we need to change?’

“Do we need to change something again for next year which would free up an unlocked ergometry that shows some promise, but we can’t get on to this year’s car? You’ll start to see that probably now.

“It’s just whether you say a bigger change for next year is viable, realistic, financially achievable and do we have the resources to do it? That we’ll find out.”

Monaghan said that early analysis of the RB20 had indicated that there remained plenty of scope to make it better, which will make the challenge for its rivals to catch up so much harder.

“At the moment gains are still there,” he said. “Magnitude wise at the moment we can find similar gains to last year. I suspect towards the end of the year it may well diminish a bit, but we’ve got some brilliantly creative people and if they find it, then we’ll take it. It’s as simple as that.”

But while the RB20 looks visually very different to its predecessor, especially with its sidepods and engine cover gulleys, Monaghan says it is not as radical a step as some have suggested.

“The magnitude of evolution, if you watch it visually, isn’t necessarily indicative of what we have achieved in terms of lap time,” he said. “You have to make it stable.

“It’s not good having a peaky car that is behaving itself in one aspect of the track and not in others. To my mind we had a pretty good car last year and to drift a long way from that for greater risks, it seems an unwise choice.

“An evolution of what we had last year, if we put enough in it to keep ourselves quicker than the opposition, then it's the right thing to do."

Read Also:
Previous article Wolff doesn't want to fall into Horner "trap" over Red Bull F1 dominance
Next article Vowles: Current F1 regulations not a failure despite dirty air issue

Top Comments

Latest news