Mallya “disappointed” with Haas views on F1 income

Force India boss Vijay Mallya is “disappointed” that fellow F1 team owner Gene Haas has expressed his support for the current pattern of income distribution in the sport.

Mallya “disappointed” with Haas views on F1 income
Dr. Vijay Mallya, Sahara Force India F1 Team Owner
Gene Haas F1 Team, Team Owner, Haas F1 Team
Sergio Perez, Force India VJM10
Esteban Ocon, Force India VJM10
Dr. Vijay Mallya, Sahara Force India F1 Team Owner
 Romain Grosjean, Haas F1 Team VF-17
 Esteban Ocon, Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
 Romain Grosjean, Haas F1 Team VF-17, Kevin Magnussen, Haas F1 Team VF-17
 Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari SF70H, Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H
Chase Carey, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of the Formula One Group
 Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari SF70H, Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H, Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13, Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull Racing RB13, Carlos Sainz Jr., Scuderia Toro Rosso STR12
 Esteban Ocon, Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
 Sergio Perez, Sahara Force India F1 VJM10
 Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari SF70H, Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H, Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08

Along with Haas, Force India is one of the few teams that has no special deal on top of the regular performance-based prize fund, and Mallya has long been campaigning for a fairer split of income.

F1 CEO Chase Carey has also made it clear that the new owners want the system to change, in part to help to close up the grid.

However, in Monaco, Haas raised a few eyebrows when he indicated that the top F1 teams should retain a significant advantage in income redistribution - and even claimed that the sport should avoid moving to a “socialistic-type structure.”

Mallya believes that such talk – which some sceptical observers have suggested may have been encouraged by Haas’s close relationship with Ferrari – will not help the push for change.

“I find it actually disappointing that such a new entrant in F1, who has no previous experience of owning an F1 team, makes such a profound statement,” he told Motorsport.com.

“Anybody looking at the income distribution pattern of F1 will immediately, without even being prompted, realise how lopsided it all is.

"Clearly the DNA of F1 must include independent teams, not just manufacturer teams. And independent teams need to be able to be financially viable and able to compete.

“So I was particularly happy when Liberty Media and Chase Carey effectively said that what Force India has been pleading for a while now, that the income distribution needs to be revisited, and adjusted to be fair to the smaller teams as well.

"For Haas to make such a profound statement, I obviously found that to be disappointing.”

Mallya is hopeful that changes can be introduced even before the current Concorde Agreement expires.

“I see no reason why it won’t happen before 2020. I’ve read that Chase doesn’t like the so-called Concorde Agreement, which in his view should never have existed.

"I think he’s made it clear that the independent arrangements that various teams made with Bernie were not good for the sport, and actually prevented a level and competitive field.

“I was encouraged to hear FOM, for the very first time, speak my language. This is not something that we’ve just been saying now, we’ve been saying it for years.

"I was very pleased to hear Chase support our view, and equally disappointed to see that one of the participating teams held an almost opposite view.

"It’s pretty obvious from the Haas car that they are more than just associated with Ferrari.”

Level financial playing field "can only be good for F1"

Mallya is pleased that Carey and Ross Brawn want to adjust the rules to ensure that in the future the grid is closer together, and that current midfield teams have a shot at winning races.

“It was music to my ears when Chase basically said that money cannot buy performance, and that everybody should have a level playing field. Unfortunately it now it shows very clearly that competitiveness at the front end of the grid really is about how much you spend.

"They need to even that out – they have publicly said it, that money shouldn’t be able to buy performance, or affect the competitive advantage of any team on the grid.

“That’s obviously something I haven’t heard for a long time, and I’m delighted to hear it now. It’s all a question of how quickly they get the act together.

"In addition to all this, we’ve spoken at length about resource restriction or a spending cap. We’ve been speaking about this for years. Now Liberty seems to be talking the same language, which is great.

“It can only be good for F1, it can only be good for teams like Force India. If we have a resource cap on one side where teams are prevented from spending unlimited amounts of money, and we have better income distribution on the other side - not only by balancing the mathematical calculation itself, or the income distribution policy, but more income through increased revenues - all this is fantastic. I’ve waited 10 years for it.”

Mallya is also encouraged by the fact that Ferrari and Red Bull have – for the first time – indicated that they would prefer to spend less, especially on R&D, in the future.

“I think that a whole bunch of factors have come together to cause this change in thinking. Ferrari is a listed company, and if they spend less, they make more, and that has an impact on their market capitalisation.

"I’ve often wondered why people would not support a cost cap in the past, but now it’s becoming clearer that there’s a shift in mindset.”

shares
comments
Honda upgrade "very tight" to be ready for Canada
Previous article

Honda upgrade "very tight" to be ready for Canada

Next article

Wolff backs push for louder F1 engines

Wolff backs push for louder F1 engines
Load comments
The factors that could negate Red Bull's practice gap to Mercedes Prime

The factors that could negate Red Bull's practice gap to Mercedes

Mercedes led the way in practice for Formula 1’s first race in Jeddah, where Red Bull was off the pace on both single-lap and long runs. But, if Max Verstappen can reverse the results on Saturday, factors familiar in motorsport’s main electric single-seater category could be decisive in another close battle with Lewis Hamilton...

Why Norris doesn’t expect Mr Nice Guy praise for much longer Prime

Why Norris doesn’t expect Mr Nice Guy praise for much longer

Earning praise from rivals has been a welcome sign that Lando Norris is becoming established among Formula 1's elite. But the McLaren driver is confident that his team's upward curve can put him in the mix to contend for titles in the future, when he's hoping the compliments will be replaced by being deemed an equal adversary

Formula 1
Dec 2, 2021
What Ferrari still needs to improve to return to F1 title contention Prime

What Ferrari still needs to improve to return to F1 title contention

After a disastrous 2020 in which it slumped to sixth in the F1 constructors' standings, Ferrari has rebounded strongly and is on course to finish third - despite regulations that forced it to carryover much of its forgettable SF1000 machine. Yet while it can be pleased with its improvement, there are still steps it must make if 2022 is to yield a return to winning ways

Formula 1
Dec 2, 2021
How F1 teams and personnel react in pressurised situations Prime

How F1 teams and personnel react in pressurised situations

OPINION: The pressure is firmly on Red Bull and Mercedes as Formula 1 2021 embarks on its final double-header. How the respective teams deal with that will be a crucial factor in deciding the outcome of the drivers' and constructors' championships, as Motorsport.com's technical consultant and ex-McLaren F1 engineer Tim Wright explains.

Formula 1
Dec 1, 2021
How getting sacked from Benetton made Mercedes' Allison Prime

How getting sacked from Benetton made Mercedes' Allison

He’s had a hand in world championship-winning Formula 1 cars for Benetton, Renault and Mercedes, and was also a cog in the Schumacher-Ferrari axis. Having recently ‘moved upstairs’ as Mercedes chief technical officer, James Allison tells Stuart Codling about his career path and why being axed by Benetton was one of the best things that ever happened to him.

Formula 1
Nov 28, 2021
The remarkable qualities that propelled Kubica’s F1 comeback Prime

The remarkable qualities that propelled Kubica’s F1 comeback

It’s easy to look at Robert Kubica’s second Formula 1 career and feel a sense of sadness that he didn’t reach the heights for which he seemed destined. But as Ben Anderson discovered, performance and results are almost meaningless in this context – something more fundamental and incredible happened…

Formula 1
Nov 27, 2021
The humbling changes Ricciardo made to deliver for McLaren Prime

The humbling changes Ricciardo made to deliver for McLaren

From being lapped by his own teammate in Monaco to winning at Monza, it’s been a tumultuous first season at McLaren for Daniel Ricciardo. But, as he tells STUART CODLING, there’s more to the story of his turnaround than having a lovely summer holiday during Formula 1's summer break...

Formula 1
Nov 26, 2021
The potential benefits of losing the F1 constructors' title Prime

The potential benefits of losing the F1 constructors' title

As the battle continues to rage over the F1 2021 drivers' championship, teams up and down the grid are turning their attentions to the prize money attributed to each position in the constructors' standings. But F1's sliding scale rules governing wind tunnel and CFD use will soften the blow for those who miss out on the top places

Formula 1
Nov 25, 2021