FIA reveals conditions of Ferrari’s engine veto
FIA president Jean Todt has revealed that there are conditions attached to Ferrari's veto over Formula 1 rules, in the wake of the controversy over engine cost caps.










Ferrari recently exercised its right to block a plan to limit the price of customer engines to $12 million per season, which has left the FIA pursuing instead a plan to find a cheap standard power unit for customer teams.
But while accepting that the cost cap veto was within Ferrari's rights, Todt has made it clear that the Italian team is only able to use its power if it can prove that its own commercial interests are damaged.
"The veto right, which is in favour of Ferrari, is an historic veto right," explained Todt. "But it has to be demonstrated that it is something that goes against their interest.
"Trying to suggest a [standard] customer engine for teams is not against their interest? I am happy if we go and debate on that."
Maranello isolation
Todt knows full well about the Ferrari veto, having been team principal himself of the Italian team from 1993 to 2007.
However, he says he questioned it remaining a part of Ferrari's rights when the last commercial agreements were reached with teams ahead of the 2013 season.
"It originated in the 1980's, when the Concorde Agreement got implemented," said Todt about the history of the veto.
"It is something I was curious about, because when I joined Ferrari in 1993 I tried to understand what was the story behind it. And the story behind it was simple.
"Enzo Ferrari was the founder, and he was very isolated in Maranello compared to all the British teams. He was alone and you will remember, in the 1980's, Ferrari was the only full car manufacturer of engine and chassis.
"And he was facing private teams, like Williams, Lotus and McLaren, that were all using the same engine. If I remember it was a Ford Cosworth engine. So he got that [veto] in his discussions to implement.
"It was something that was given to him in the Concorde Agreement and it was always taken into consideration and accepted.
"When we arrived in 2013, it was the first time as president of the FIA I was facing the consideration of the veto right, and I must say that I was very cautious, because it is like having a gun. So was I, as president of the FIA, prepared to give that?
"And I was surprised because Bernie as commercial rights holder was in favour of Ferrari having the veto right. All the teams were in favour of giving the veto right too. So it would have been a bit strange that myself, I would have been against.
"I know sometimes I get blamed because I try to have a harmonious situation and everyone going in the same direction, but course I agreed to implement the veto right in the discussions of the renewal of the Concorde Agreement 2013-2020.
"We simply changed the wording of it, to make it more precise. So it not a veto right, you need to have a strong rational to be able to exercise it."

Previous article
Pirelli: Medium and soft compounds for one of the shortest laps of the year
Next article
Two engine types "a can of worms" for F1 - Lotus

About this article
Series | Formula 1 |
Drivers | Kimi Raikkonen , Sebastian Vettel |
Author | Jonathan Noble |
FIA reveals conditions of Ferrari’s engine veto
Can Mercedes' W12 retain the team's crown?
Replacing Formula 1's fastest car was never going to be an easy feat for Mercedes. Amid the technical rule tweaks to peg back the W12 and its 2021 rivals, the new Mercedes challenger will remain the target to beat
The pointed note that starts Ferrari's Leclerc vs Sainz era
Ferrari is starting its post-Sebastian Vettel age by welcoming Carlos Sainz in alongside Charles Leclerc. But while Sainz has a tough challenge to match his new teammate, Ferrari is also sending a message that previous intra-team spats must end
The mantra Ocon must follow to challenge Alonso at Alpine
OPINION: It's been an uneasy ride for Esteban Ocon since his F1 comeback - and fresh challenges lie in wait as he's joined by double world champion Fernando Alonso in the newly rebranded Alpine team. STUART CODLING sets out a roadmap to success…
Why Haas is willing to sacrifice its 2021 F1 season
Every Formula 1 team is facing the same difficult decision this season: how do you split precious aero development time between the current car and the all-new 2022 project?
The big questions of F1 2021 - Karun Chandhok
After an unprecedented season last year, there are plenty of questions and storylines for the upcoming Formula 1 campaign. Sky Sports F1 pundit Karun Chandhok gives his verdict.
How McLaren F1’s new investors have already made an impact
The deal McLaren concluded with MSP Sports Capital last year which will help the cash-strapped Formula 1 team pay for much-needed infrastructure upgrades, also points toward the future for F1 itself, says GP Racing's Stuart Codling.
Why Verstappen isn't interested in the hype game
In a pre-season where Red Bull has been unusually quiet, Max Verstappen has also been guarded about the team's fortunes in 2021. Even after trying the RB16B for the first time at Silverstone, the Dutchman was careful to manage expectations
The pros and cons of F1's 2021 rule changes
In the strategy for grand prix racing's future, 2021 represents a significant step towards the goal of closer racing and a more level playing field. That's the theory behind the latest raft of changes, but will they have the desired effect?