Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

David Croft "perplexed" by Monaco GP penalties: "Something was a bit amiss"

Formula 1
Monaco GP
David Croft "perplexed" by Monaco GP penalties: "Something was a bit amiss"

Why Alpine’s attempt to dispute Monaco result may open a can of worms

Formula 1
Monaco GP
Why Alpine’s attempt to dispute Monaco result may open a can of worms

Peugeot’s scathing explanation for Le Mans qualifying debacle: “We are in WEC”

WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Peugeot’s scathing explanation for Le Mans qualifying debacle: “We are in WEC”

Trackhouse team owner Justin Marks to race for Spire in San Diego Truck race

NASCAR Truck
San Diego
Trackhouse team owner Justin Marks to race for Spire in San Diego Truck race

Sheldon Creed debuts a partnership on the cutting edge of brain optimization

NASCAR O'Reilly
Pocono
Sheldon Creed debuts a partnership on the cutting edge of brain optimization

Le Mans 24h: Toyota spins and then goes fastest in FP2

WEC
24 Hours of Le Mans
Le Mans 24h: Toyota spins and then goes fastest in FP2

The 2026 Le Mans 24 Hours entry list in full

WEC
Spa
The 2026 Le Mans 24 Hours entry list in full

Josh Berry ‘not surprised’ but optimistic’ for future after losing Wood Brothers seat

NASCAR Cup
Josh Berry ‘not surprised’ but optimistic’ for future after losing Wood Brothers seat
Breaking news

Ferrari wants "clarity and transparency" on car copying

Ferrari hopes to gain “clarity and transparency” from the FIA over the rules on Formula 1 car copying after formalising its appeal in the Racing Point brake duct case.

Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF1000, Nico Hulkenberg, Racing Point RP20

Racing Point was deemed to have copied the design of Mercedes’ 2019 brake ducts for its 2020 car following a protest lodged by Renault, resulting in a 15-point constructors’ championship penalty and a €400,000 fine.

But the team is allowed to continue using the rear brake ducts for the remainder of the season as the FIA stewards said it could not be expected to unlearn the designs.

Racing Point is appealing the ruling in a bid to overturn the penalty, while both Ferrari and Renault are also proceeding with legal action as they pursue a harsher sanction.

Read Also:

While the FIA has confirmed it will clamp down on attempts to copy other cars from next season, Ferrari F1 boss Mattia Binotto said the thrust of his team's appeal was to gain clarity on how intellectual property of teams could be protected.

“The reason why we have confirmed our appeal, I think it’s because we need to seek clarification and transparency,” Binotto said.

“I think the brake duct is a point, but I think that eventually the decision of the International Court of Appeal open up a more wider and broader discussion on the carbon copy car concept, which for us is important.

“It’s important as well for the future of the Formula 1, because at the end it’s about discussing intellectual property, and I think that intellectual property is a very important asset of a company.

“If someone would somehow copy almost an identical car of the previous year of a competitor, I think the regulations should somehow protect the competitor itself.

“That’s why I think at the moment it’s important simply to move forward and understand, [for] clarity, transparency, [and] for the fairness of the competition and for the future of Formula 1 is important.”

Read Also:

The FIA’s head of single-seaters, Nikolas Tombazis, and FIA secretary general for sport Peter Bayer informed teams in the wake of the Racing Point ruling that a similar approach to designing cars would be outlawed from 2021.

Racing Point designed its RP20 car by studying photographs of the 2019 title-winning Mercedes W10 and reverse engineering the concept, resulting in an uplift in form for this year.

Bayer wrote to teams ahead of the Spanish Grand Prix to say that next year’s rules would be updated to “expressly prevent teams from using photography or other reverse engineering techniques to copy large parts of other teams' cars”.

Ferrari emphasised the importance of teams protecting their intellectual property when defending its decision not to release the details of its engine settlement with the FIA earlier this year.

Previous article F1 engine mode restriction postponed until Italian GP
Next article Verstappen: Nine races in 11 weeks the "limit" for F1

Top Comments

Latest news