Ecclestone: F1's 2021 engine plan expensive and unnecessary
Bernie Ecclestone reckons it is no surprise that Formula 1 manufacturers have criticised the 2021 power unit regulations proposed recently by the FIA and the sport's new owners.
Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari SF70H, Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes AMG F1 W08, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari SF70H, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB13, Fernando Alonso, McLaren MCL32, the rest of the field at the start
Steve Etherington / Motorsport Images
The engine proposals for 2021 were not well received by Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault, who reckon they would have to spend a lot again in order to adapt to the new units.
Former F1 CEO Ecclestone, who was deposed in January, believes that the changes involve too much extra expense on top of the existing investment, and that there was a less complex way of addressing the situation.
"The trouble is they've all spent a fortune on these bloody engines," Ecclestone told Motorsport.com.
"And they don't want to go back to their boards and say, 'We need another few quid because we need to modify the engines.'
"I think, honestly they should do something really different, or leave it alone.
"All they had to do was what we agreed three years ago, I think, with Jean Todt, which was more fuel flow, and more fuel in the car, and let them rev to another 2000 revs. That's all that was necessary."
Ecclestone is sceptical about the prospects of the new owners being able to follow through on the changes that they want to make to improve the sport.
"They shouldn't have made so many predictions, should they, as to what they could do. They should have waited to see what can be done.
"I'm sure what they had in mind and wanted to do was alright. The problem is doing it.
"All we really had to do was have a look at when was F1 really popular? Let's get the rulebook out and let's do it that way.
"I haven't seen any difference really. The racing's good – it's better now than it was. We've been waiting four years for this, so it's a little bit easier, when there's competition. Now Ferrari's woken up, it's good."
Ecclestone questioned Liberty's unprecedented investment in marketing the sport and F1's enlarged commercial department, having always maintained that his brief from previous owners CVC was to keep costs in check and bring in a profit.
Liberty recently announced a reduced profit and hence less income for teams, due in part to the extra investment.
"You have television every couple of weeks and television during the off-period, and the teams are all talking, everybody's talking. So what could we talk about? What can anyone talk about? Say to people come and see F1, it's super?
"I was the chief executive with the job of making it look good, making sure that they could sell the shares. We were trying to sell for four years, and eventually we got it together and sold."
He also expressed doubts about the prospect of more races taking place in the USA, having tried in many venues over the decades, most recently in New Jersey.
"I want to see them get more races in America. As they don't seem to be looking for money, maybe it's possible. If you're looking to make money, that's not the way to do it. That's why I went east."
Be part of Motorsport community
Join the conversationShare Or Save This Story
Subscribe and access Motorsport.com with your ad-blocker.
From Formula 1 to MotoGP we report straight from the paddock because we love our sport, just like you. In order to keep delivering our expert journalism, our website uses advertising. Still, we want to give you the opportunity to enjoy an ad-free and tracker-free website and to continue using your adblocker.
Top Comments