Can F1 really give up wind tunnels by 2030?

Could Formula 1 really operate without wind tunnels and focus solely on CFD from 2030?

Can F1 really give up wind tunnels by 2030?
Listen to this article

That's the hope of many in the sport, and the plan has the tentative support of a majority of team bosses.

It was discussed at a meeting of the F1 Commission late last year, and in an exploratory vote, eight of out 10 teams backed the basic principle.

The vote was on a "statement of intent" about something that probably seemed far away at the time. However, any decision that adheres to the 2030 timeline will have to be made sooner rather than later, so that everyone can plan for the change. Thus the debate is ongoing.

The idea of an F1 wind tunnel ban is still coloured to some degree by the Virgin team's much-vaunted efforts to focus on CFD for its 2010 machine, which was hardly a great advert for what was an ambitious strategy at the time.

The technology has moved on massively since then, and racing cars in other categories have been designed totally via CFD.

Timo Glock, Virgin VR-01 Cosworth

Timo Glock, Virgin VR-01 Cosworth

Photo by: Charles Coates / Motorsport Images

The F1 organisation is fully behind a move away from wind tunnels. Its own engineers focussed on CFD when helping the FIA to define the 2022 rules package, although that research was made more effective by not having to comply with the FIA limitations on CFD resources that are applied to the teams. It thus had some powerful tools at its disposal.

There are two obvious reasons behind the push to abandon tunnels. Firstly there is the environmental impact, related to the energy required by wind tunnels. That's why the plan is aligned with F1's stated date of 2030 for making the sport carbon neutral.

Tunnels consume vast amounts of electricity – one estimate puts a team's typical bill at over £1million worth in a year. Multiply that out for the 10 F1 teams and you can see why the sport's bosses are keen to rein in it, even if some competitors – notably Mercedes – have made a virtue of using renewably sourced energy.

Aside from the sustainability issues that huge cost is itself significant. The budget cap is only going to go one way in the years to come, and that's downwards. Teams will have to continue to look for ways to cut their spending without impacting the relentless pursuit for performance. Take wind tunnels out of the equation and there's a sizeable saving.

Tunnel costs are not just related to the energy bill, but also the personnel required to run and maintain them. There's also the cost of model making departments, which involves salaries as well as materials and machinery.

Teams are coy about putting an exact number on the annual cost of operating a tunnel, but estimates start at £5m. Those who don't have their own tunnels and instead rent time elsewhere typically pay around £25,000 a day, which adds up across a season, and doesn't include model costs.

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W12, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B, and Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes W12, prepare to lead the field away for the start

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes W12, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B, and Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes W12, prepare to lead the field away for the start

Photo by: Steve Etherington / Motorsport Images

CFD supercomputer systems also use a lot of energy, and they require extensive cooling – think of the current debate about the resources consumed by Bitcoin mining. However, it's still less than tunnels require.

For many years, teams had total freedom in how they split their R&D work between CFD and tunnels. The current Aerodynamic Testing Restrictions as outlined in the FIA sporting regulations mandate very specific limits on tunnel runs and CFD usage, with a reverse sliding scale – based on last year's championship position – now in use to help out the less competitive teams.

Those rules could easily be adjusted in the coming years to encourage teams to favour CFD as the tools become ever more powerful. But could the FIA really eventually oblige teams to use only CFD?

The key is to consider where the technology will be by 2030 – and how Moore's Law, the theory that computing power doubles every two years, will play out.

That process will also contribute to reduced costs, so the necessary computing power will become cheaper. On the other hand, the price of building a new tunnel, while keeping abreast of the latest technology, will only increase.

Teams are understandably wary of the sport making a definite commitment to abandoning tunnels, but the long lead time gives them a little wiggle room.

"I think that all the teams are open to the discussion," says Ferrari's Mattia Binotto. "And open to accept it eventually, because it's a long time from now.

"Are we today ready to ban the wind tunnel? Not at all. I think in general it has always been about design simulations and testing, and testing is still very important, whatever it is – aerodynamics, power units, etcetera.

"I think that in terms of cost reductions, we are already reducing at the moment the hours in the wind tunnel, which is a step in the right direction.

"Banning it completely, if you would do it today, the testing would be on track, and that would be even more expensive, rather than doing it in the wind tunnel. So I don't think the times are mature today for a decision."

Wind tunnel model

Wind tunnel model

Photo by: Lotus F1 Team

"The risk is that people lose the correlation with the track," says Alpine's Marcin Budkowski. "And the tunnel is an important element of this. F1 loves a challenge, and I think if you tell us that in 10 years' time we move away from something that is essential for development, because we're going to ramp up the simulation part of it, I think it's doable."

One of the big supporters of a move to CFD is Red Bull Racing, a team noted for its aerodynamic excellence, led of course by Adrian Newey. He's fully behind an eventual ban, noting that "wind tunnels have been great, but they've served their purpose."

His team boss is also keen to see the change happen.

"It's a topic I brought up a few months ago," says Christian Horner. "A wind tunnel isn't particularly efficient, it's not very environmentally friendly.

"The way that CFD is evolving so rapidly – for example, the Valkyrie never went in a wind tunnel once during its whole development phase – I think if you take a 10-year view on this, so it's far enough out that these effectively dinosaurs of machinery that are heavily consuming electricity and power become a thing of the past. F1 should be the cutting edge of technology."

Horner makes the valid point that F1 is attracting more high-tech partners and sponsors, the sort of people who could help to provide the computing power that will be needed. In contrast wind tunnels represent capital outlay.

"We're seeing more and more investment from the tech sector, so why not be the showcase for that tech, with F1?" he says. "I think if it is something like 10 years away, then there's a glide path towards it that every team knows it's coming, and you adjust your investment over the period of time accordingly."

That's a key point. Some teams have relatively new or recently upgraded tunnels that won't need a lot of investment in the coming years. However others, notably Aston Martin and McLaren, have plans to build new facilities that will now have a relatively short life.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

Despite the prospect of its new tunnel becoming obsolete in less than a decade, Aston Martin still intends to make the investment.

"We're putting plans in place now to build a tunnel," says Otmar Szafnauer. "I think aerodynamics are still a big differentiator in our sport, and to have your own is advantageous, or to not have your own can be disadvantageous, that's maybe the right way to say it.

"So right now, we are seriously considering the build of the tunnel, and we'll probably kick it off soon. The 2030 question, if we get it done in a couple of years' time, I think there's still a decent period of time to get use from a new tunnel."

Teams like Aston and McLaren that build new tunnels now might actually be in a strong position in 2027-'29 because rivals will opt not to invest in updated technology, and will make do with what they have at the moment.

Szafnauer cautions that tunnels will remain essential for a few years at least.

"As we sit here now, CFD cannot replace tunnels," he says. "Not for what we use CFD for. CFD is great if you have very simple aerofoils or aerodynamic problems to solve.

"But an F1 car has so many interactions and so many intricacies that you're trying to solve, and CFD is not capable at this point.

"There are aspects of CFD that you can apply that work, but to just go CFD, it's not as good as CFD with a tunnel."

He also questions the overall financial savings, implying that money will potentially be wasted on bringing parts from CFD straight to the full-size car only to find out that they don't work as intended.

"Running a tunnel doesn't cost you that much," he says. "It's just the electricity, and every once in a while, a bit of maintenance. You replace belts that are expensive, but not that often.

"The expensive bit of running a tunnel programme is actually making the model parts that you have to put in a tunnel. That's the expensive part. So if you get rid of tunnel testing, you can certainly save some money.

Otmar Szafnauer, Team Principal and CEO, Aston Martin F1, on the pit wall

Otmar Szafnauer, Team Principal and CEO, Aston Martin F1, on the pit wall

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

"But then there will always be unintended consequences of not getting really what you want on the car, and then you run it for the first time, and that's not good, and then you throw all those parts out. Before you know it, what you did in the tunnel, you're now doing on track.

"That's 100% car parts and they're more expensive. And so it won't be completely a 100% saving of what you now spend in the tunnel."

In a similar vein, some have cited safety concerns should teams be obliged to skip the model/tunnel stage and go straight to the track, where problems could become apparent.

"I think there was broad agreement that over the long term this will happen," Toto Wolff noted after last year's initial vote. "But it such a massive regulatory change that also involves certain safety aspects.

"We must not forget that these cars are the fastest on the planet, with the most downforce, and we don't want to experiment live with drivers in the cars based on CFD."

One suggestion is that a limited element of tunnel usage could maintained after 2030, mainly for safety verification, using full-size cars. The Sauber tunnel in Hinwil is capable of undertaking such testing, for example.

An alternative would be to reintroduce straight line aerodynamic running with real cars, which has not been on the agenda for a few years.

With or without tunnels, aerodynamic research will remain a key area of spending, one where the cleverest people with the best ideas will ultimately triumph. It's just the tools that are used that will change.

shares
comments

Related video

Red Bull won't open Perez contract talks before summer break
Previous article

Red Bull won't open Perez contract talks before summer break

Next article

Flexi-wings won't be "a game-changer at all" in Baku

Flexi-wings won't be "a game-changer at all" in Baku
The sliding doors moment that saved Red Bull and Porsche Prime

The sliding doors moment that saved Red Bull and Porsche

OPINION: Everything looked set for Red Bull and Porsche to join forces for the 2026 season, before the marriage between both parties was called off. While at the time it looked like a major coup for Formula 1 in gaining both VW Group powerhouses Audi and Porsche for 2026, Red Bull and Porsche have really been spared a potentially fractious relationship.

How Tyrrell’s post-Stewart era descended into a fight to survive Prime

How Tyrrell’s post-Stewart era descended into a fight to survive

Glory days for Tyrrell became increasingly infrequent
 after Jackie Stewart’s retirement. But in the latest instalment of his history of the team for Autosport's sister title GP Racing, 
MAURICE HAMILTON recalls how Ken Tyrrell’s plucky and defiantly small team stayed bold enough to innovate – springing a surprise with F1’s first six-wheeled car

How departing F1 boss Brawn views F1’s new rules - and the future Prime

How departing F1 boss Brawn views F1’s new rules - and the future

Multiple-title-winning designer and team boss Ross Brawn is finally leaving Formula 1 after nearly 50 years in motorsport. But he still has plenty of insights on what’s working and what comes next, as he revealed to Motorsport.com in a far-reaching exclusive interview in Abu Dhabi.

Formula 1
Dec 2, 2022
The key F1 management call Ferrari must make to avoid more defeat Prime

The key F1 management call Ferrari must make to avoid more defeat

OPINION: Mattia Binotto’s departure from Ferrari will naturally bring a range of changes across the Formula 1 team. But how the changes shape up and the impact they could have is set to be dictated by a key direction Ferrari’s top dogs will need to pick

Formula 1
Nov 30, 2022
The difference between Mercedes’ stumble and the fall of F1 giants Prime

The difference between Mercedes’ stumble and the fall of F1 giants

OPINION: Mercedes endured its worst season of the hybrid Formula 1 era, but was mercifully spared its first winless campaign in over a decade late on. It has owned up to the mistakes it made which led to its troubled W13. And while its task to return to title-challenging contention is not small, its 2022 season seems more like a blip than the beginning of a downward spiral.

Formula 1
Nov 29, 2022
The physical focus bringing out the best from Esteban Ocon Prime

The physical focus bringing out the best from Esteban Ocon

Esteban Ocon likes to point out he’s the first driver since Lewis Hamilton to emerge from a spell as Fernando Alonso’s teammate with a superior overall points record. While some may disagree, as LUKE SMITH discovered, the 2021 Hungarian GP winner reckons it’s not just luck which has made him France’s pre-eminent Formula 1 driver of the moment…

Formula 1
Nov 28, 2022
How Red Bull's dynamic leader Mateschitz shaped its F1 philosophy Prime

How Red Bull's dynamic leader Mateschitz shaped its F1 philosophy

The death of Dietrich Mateschitz last month has not only deprived Red Bull of its visionary founder, it has shorn Formula 1 of one of its most influential benefactors. Mateschitz himself was famously media-shy, preferring to let the brand do the talking on his behalf. And, while it’s now normal to speak of Red Bull F1 titles and champions made, Mateschitz never assumed it would be easy or even possible – as ANTHONY ROWLINSON discovered during this previously unpublished interview from 2006…

Formula 1
Nov 27, 2022
Can Mercedes break Formula 1's cycle of doom? Prime

Can Mercedes break Formula 1's cycle of doom?

OPINION: Teams that have dominated for long periods throughout Formula 1's history often take years to get back to the top of the tree once they've slipped down. But it remains to be seen whether the same will happen to Mercedes after a challenging 2022 season

Formula 1
Nov 24, 2022