Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Recommended for you

Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

Feature
Formula 1
Feature
Dutch GP
Could McLaren follow Red Bull’s path with its own F1 engine – and should it?

Guenther Steiner sets condition for potential F1 return

Formula 1
Dutch GP
Guenther Steiner sets condition for potential F1 return

Isack Hadjar identifies key area he must improve compared to Max Verstappen

Formula 1
Dutch GP
Isack Hadjar identifies key area he must improve compared to Max Verstappen

DTM calendar 2027 announced: No internationalization for now, clashes with WEC

DTM
DTM calendar 2027 announced: No internationalization for now, clashes with WEC

Charles Leclerc and wife Alexandra appear to address pregnancy rumours with holiday photos

Formula 1
Dutch GP
Charles Leclerc and wife Alexandra appear to address pregnancy rumours with holiday photos

The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Formula 1
The subtle but significant changes McLaren will make for its 2027 F1 car

Valtteri Bottas sees clear Cadillac progress amid challenging first F1 season

Formula 1
Dutch GP
Valtteri Bottas sees clear Cadillac progress amid challenging first F1 season

F1 2026 mid-season grades: Red Bull stumbles but summer rally shows glimmer of progress

Formula 1
F1 2026 mid-season grades: Red Bull stumbles but summer rally shows glimmer of progress
Breaking news

McLaren: Testing at new F1 tracks would send “wrong sign”

McLaren Formula 1 boss Andreas Seidl has welcomed the ban on testing at new Formula 1 venues, saying it would have sent the wrong sign.

Jules Danilo, CIA Landlord Insurance Honda

The FIA sporting regulations allow teams to run 2018 cars without limitation, as long as the governing body is kept informed, and several had been planning to visit Portimao, Imola or Mugello before the newly-scheduled races there.

Prior to the start of the season and before the calendar additions were confirmed, Ferrari was able to run a 2018 car at its own Mugello venue, while AlphaTauri went to Imola, where it combined extensive 2018 running with a filming day with the current car.

In recent weeks, teams have been negotiating with the circuits for track availability, but that planning has now been stopped thanks to an initiative pushed through by F1 boss Ross Brawn, on the grounds of costs and the fact that the teams taking part would have gained a competitive advantage. 

The teams agreed at the recent Strategy Group and F1 Commission meetings that they would not visit the new tracks before the races there, and a rule change is being approved by the FIA World Motor Sport Council.

McLaren was not able to conducts tests at new venues before the start of the 2020 season because it didn’t have an older car available, available but Seidl conceded that the team might have been forced into finding a suitable machine.

“I’m very happy with this outcome,” said Seidl when asked by Motorsport.com. “And yes, not a secret that we were also pushing for that, because especially when you think about going to new tracks I think it puts you at a competitive disadvantage if other people can go testing.

"I think even we considered taking out one of our own cars and going there.”

Read Also:

Seidl said the extra travel for personnel was another consideration.

“It would definitely have been absolutely the wrong sign also to the public and towards our people as well in the times of COVID, in the times of where we should avoid any unnecessary trouble for our people in order to protect them.

“I think it would have been completely the wrong sign also to do these tests. And therefore, I'm very happy with the outcome. And it was good to see that in the end, all teams agreed on this, which is not always the case.”

Mercedes ran a 2018 W09 at Silverstone to get its drivers back up to speed before the start of the season, but team boss Toto Wolff agreed the ban was a good move.

“We would have taken the 2018 car to some of the tracks,” he said when asked by Motorsport.com. “We were planning to go to Portimao, but I think that it’s not the right call. 

"I think we’re all looking at saving costs with the prize fund being considerably down, and in that respect, if nobody gains an advantage by not going testing, it’s the right thing to do.”

Mercedes ran a two-year old car for George Russell and Nicholas Latifi at the Algarve circuit in 2017, but Wolff played down the value of any knowledge gained.

“We went to Portimao quite a few times, but I don’t think you can extract any performance topics from a car that back then was two years old.”

Gunther Steiner, whose Haas team does not have a running 2018 car that it could call upon, also stressed the cost issue.

“I mean it’s the right thing to do, especially in the financial circumstances most of the teams are in,” he said. “We don’t need to exaggerate in the moment.”

Previous article Wolff: Engine mode ban can make Mercedes faster in race
Next article Tost: F1's constructor definition is “out of date”

Top Comments

Latest news